NORWALK, CT —
OSHA Inspection: NAUGATUCK CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NAUGATUCK CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS, LLC in 107 SOUTH MAIN STREET, NORWALK, CT 06854 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 346214976.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NAUGATUCK CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS, LLC
- Site address
- 107 SOUTH MAIN STREET
- City
- NORWALK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06854
- Mailing
- 21 RIVER RIDGE COURT, STAMFORD, CT 06902
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238110
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2023
- Abate by
- Feb 21, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 107 South Main Street, Norwalk, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1; Citation 001, Item 2; Citation 001, Item 3 and Citation 001, Item 4 with a final order date of 11/23/2022 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 12/3/2022) following the abatement due date ( 11/23/2022).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work in the 6 foot 5 inch to 7 foot 1 inch deep trench, were provided with a means of egress by the use of a stairway, ramp or ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.651 J02
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that excavated material from the trench that employees were working in was placed at least two feet from the edge of the trench.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems: Worksite: The employer did not ensure the trench that employees were required to work in, was inspected by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in a cave-in, a failure of the protective system or other hazardous conditions.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Oct 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652 (b) or (c): Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to enter the trench at a depth greater than five feet were provided with cave-in protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238110)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346214976.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.