Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EDUARDO GONZALEZ DBA GM ROOFING; INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDUARDO GONZALEZ DBA GM ROOFING; INC. in 4847 W CATALPA AVE, CHICAGO, IL 60630 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346220635.

Watch Eduardo Gonzalez DBA GM Roofing; INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eduardo Gonzalez DBA GM Roofing; INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4847 W CATALPA AVE
City
CHICAGO
State
IL
ZIP
60630
Mailing
1333 WILLOW AVE., DES PLAINES, IL 60016
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $413.00 · Current $413.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Eduardo Gonzalez dba GM Roofing Inc, failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:  Citation Number                 Item Number                         Abatement Date 01                                              01                                               02/07/2023 01                                              02-                                             02/07/2023  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $413

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2947.00 · Current $2947.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:   a) On September 14, 2022, employees were not wearing protective helmets where there was a possible danger of head injury from falling objects.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2947

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5156.00 · Current $5156.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  a) On September 14, 2022, employees engaged in roofing activity were not protected from fall hazards while working at an elevation of approximately 14 feet above the ground.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5156

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3683.00 · Current $3683.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   a) On September 14, 2022, an extension ladder used by employees to access and egress the roof did not have its side rails extended at least 3 feet above the roof eave.   No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3683

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346220635.