NEW RICHMOND, WI —
OSHA Inspection: RED OAK LIMITED
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of RED OAK LIMITED in 1411 CERNOHOUS AVE, NEW RICHMOND, WI 54017 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346220833.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RED OAK LIMITED
- Site address
- 1411 CERNOHOUS AVE
- City
- NEW RICHMOND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54017
- Mailing
- 2226 84TH AVENUE, OSCEOLA, WI 54020
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $938 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section 5(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being struck by wood building components in the event of structural collapse: (a) Garage section of newly constructed building; On or about September 7, 2022, adequate bracing/restraint was not provided for the trusses and walls of the newly constructed 112 foot long by 80 foot wide garage area of a building while framers installed 80 foot long metal plate connected wood trusses atop 16 foot tall wooden framed walls. The workers were exposed to the hazards of being struck by building components while rigging trusses, installing trusses and when the previously set trusses and walls (north and southeast) collapsed during truss setting and bracing operations. (b) Rigging area and Garage section of newly constructed building; On or about September 7, 2022, a 30 foot long spreader bar used to lift and place 80 foot long trusses (long-span trusses) was not attached to the truss at least every 10 feet and was not at least 2/3 to 3/4 of the truss length to prevent lateral bending of the truss during handling and installation operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $937.6
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: (a) Garage section of newly constructed building; Prior to installing long-span trusses on or about September 7, 2022, employees were not trained in the BSCI requirements for installing diagonal truss bracing to stabilize continuous lateral bracing on the top chord, bottom chord, and web locations. (b) Garage section of newly constructed building; Prior to installing long-span trusses on or about September 7, 2022, employees were not trained in the BSCI requirements, which prohibit the use of metal truss spacers as lateral bracing. Metal truss spacers were used as continuous lateral bracing instead of wooden 2"x4" lateral bracing at three locations on the top truss chord.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,018 · Current $804 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) Garage section of newly constructed building; On or about September 7, 2022, hardhats (protective helmets) were not worn by employees who were exposed to overhead hazards of tools and materials striking and/or falling on their head during truss setting operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $803.6
- — Z (S) $4018
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $938 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e): (a) On or about September 7, 2022, a means of fall restraint or fall protection system was not worn while performing work from a JLG brand aerial lift during truss setting operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $937.6
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: (a) Garage section of newly constructed building; On or about September 7, 2022, a means of fall protection was not used during truss setting and bracing activities, while workers stood on wall top plates and the bottom chord of roof trusses at heights of approximately 16 feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346220833.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.