HATTIESBURG, MS ·
OSHA Inspection: MARIO VENEGAS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARIO VENEGAS in 6757 US 49, HATTIESBURG, MS 39402 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346228356.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARIO VENEGAS
- Site address
- 6757 US 49
- City
- HATTIESBURG
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39402
- Mailing
- 624 SOUTH ADAM STREET 624 SOUTH ADAM STREET, CANTON, MS 39046
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,113 · Current $2,113
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. (a) 6757 U.S 49 jobsite - On or about September 15, 2022 employees were exposed to a fall hazard while working on the edge of the roof without fall protection approximately 12 feet high.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2113
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access nor was the ladder secured at it's top to a ridgid support and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, provided to assist the employee in mounting and dismounting the the ladder: 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Because of the portable ladder's length, the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access and the ladder was not secured at its top to rigid support: (a) 6757 U.S. 49, Hattiesburg MS - On or about September 15, 2022, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while climbing the 12- 24 ft ladder to access the roof that was not secured to the building. (b) 6757 U.S. 49, Hattiesburg MS - On or about September 15, 2022, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while climbing the 12 -24 ft ladder to access the roof that did not extend 3 feet above the landing.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 346228356.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.