LITTLE FALLS, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: J & A BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J & A BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC in 1485 ROUTE 46, LITTLE FALLS, NJ 07424 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346229750.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J & A BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 1485 ROUTE 46
- City
- LITTLE FALLS
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07424
- Mailing
- 97 MAGAZINE STREET APT 2, NEWARK, NJ 07105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,018 · Current $4,018
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: a) Exterior, ground level: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while using a 4 inch grinder and were not protected with any type of eye/face protection. Th employee was cutting a sheet of metal roof, on or about 9/14/22.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4018
1926.451 B05 II
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end. a) Building Exterior: Employees were exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard while engaged in roofing activities from a pump jack scaffold that was 28 feet long. The end of the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform was able to support employees without tipping, the pump jack scaffold had an 4 foot overhang over the support, on or about 9/14/22
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.451 C03
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement: a) Building Exterior: Employees were working on a pump jack scaffold that was not plumb and braced at the bottom to prevent swaying and displacement, on or about 9/14/22.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered only under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling, or alteration and such activities were not performed by only experienced and trained employees: a) Building Left Side: Pump Jack scaffold was erected, without the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, on or about 9/14/22.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Building Exterior: Employees were working on a pump jack scaffold that was not secured at the bottom by rigid triangular or equivalent braces, on or about 9/14/22
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Roof: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet to the ground below while installing metal roofing on a commercial building without the use of personal fall arrest system or other means of fall protection in place, on or about 9/14/22.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph a) Building Exterior: The employer did not ensure that the operator of a Lull Telescopic Powered industrial truck had successfully completed training on the safe operation of a Lull Telescopic Powered industrial truck, on or about 9/14/22.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346229750.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.