Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARMANDO CERVANTES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARMANDO CERVANTES in 8743 HARBOR PINES DR., CYPRESS, TX 77433 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346245020.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Armando Cervantes — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Armando Cervantes is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ARMANDO CERVANTES
Site address
8743 HARBOR PINES DR.
City
CYPRESS
State
TX
ZIP
77433
Mailing
6900 BISSONNET ST., HOUSTON, TX 77074
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.  On or about September 24, 2022, employees were exposed to flying particles while operating a pneumatic nail gun without eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2022
Abate by
Nov 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  On or about September 24, 2022, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of more than 6 feet while working on the roof without a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  On or about September 24, 2022, the employees were exposed to a fall hazard while accessing the roof with a ladder whose side rails did not extend at least three feet above the landing surface:  Instance #1- EE's were using the ladder (#1) on the eastside of the two-story house that was under construction to get themselves, their tools, and materials up and down from the roof.   Instance #2- EE's were using the ladder (#2) on the southside of the two-story house that was under construction to get themselves, their tools, and materials up and down from the roof.   Instance #3- EE's were using the ladder (#4) on the westside of the two-story house that was under construction to get themselves, their tools, and materials up and down from the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346245020.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.