AUBURN, ME —
OSHA Inspection: YVES LAPOINTE DRYWALL, INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of YVES LAPOINTE DRYWALL, INC in 77 HARRIS STREET, AUBURN, ME 04210 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 346274376.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- YVES LAPOINTE DRYWALL, INC
- Site address
- 77 HARRIS STREET
- City
- AUBURN
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04210
- Mailing
- 264 MERROW ROAD, #1, AUBURN, ME 04210
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $7,813 · Current $7,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c):The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use (Construction Reference 1926.103): Establishment - The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for when 3M, N95, Particulate, Cool Flow Respirators were required to be used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7500
- — Z (S) $7813
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace (Construction Reference 1926.103(a)): Establishment - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation prior to employee's use of 3M, N95, Particulate, Cool Flow Respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT), (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a)): Establishment - The employer did not ensure that employees, using 3M, N95, Particulate, Cool Flow Respirators had a fit test prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01 I
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator (Construction Reference 1926.103(a)): Establishment - The employer did not ensure that employees, using 3M, N95, Particulate, Cool Flow Respirators, had appropriate annual training covering information such as, but not limited to, respirator fit, usage, and maintenance prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1153 G01 III
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $7,813 · Current $7,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1)(iii):The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the housekeeping measures used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica: Establishment - The exposure control plan did not contain a description of the housekeeping measures used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica from activities such as dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7500
- — Z (S) $7813
1926.1153 I02 I C
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $7,813 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i)(C):The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of specific measures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to respirable crystalline silica, including engineering controls, work practices, and respirators to be used: Establishment - The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of specific measures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to respirable crystalline silica such as but not limited to necessary wet sweeping work practices and respirators to be used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $7813
More inspections at Yves Lapointe Drywall, INC
View Yves Lapointe Drywall, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346274376.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.