Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: STAR CITY ROOFING CONTRACTORS, LLC.

Special Programs inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a special Programs health inspection of STAR CITY ROOFING CONTRACTORS, LLC. in 1286 ELM ST, EL PASO, TX 79907 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346279045.

Watch Star City Roofing Contractors, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Star City Roofing Contractors, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1286 ELM ST
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79907
Mailing
7117 JERICO TREE, EL PASO, TX 79934
Inspection type
Special Programs (K)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $320.00 · Current $160.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  On or about April 21, 2023, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 2 issued on January 31, 2023 with the abatement due date of March 17, 2023.  On or about April 21, 2023, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 3a issued on January 31, 2023 with the abatement due date of March 17, 2023.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $160
  • — Z (O) $320

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2277.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  On or about October 13, 2022, the employer did not protect employees who were performing residential roofing activities from falling to lower levels.  This condition exposed employees to fall hazards from 6 feet or higher.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2277

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1707.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   On or about October 13, 2022, the employer did not provide fall protection training to all employees exposed to falls.  This condition exposed employees to fall hazard of 6 feet or greater from the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $1707

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2846.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1101(f)(2)(i):The employer with a work operation covered by the asbestos standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace.  On or about October 13, 2022, the employer did not conduct an initial employee exposure assessment through a competent person before or at the initiation of the roof tile removal.  This condition exposed employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $2846

1926.1101 K01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3984.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR  1926.1101(k)(1)(i): Before work had begun, the building/ facility owners and employer did not determine the presence, location, and quantity of ACM and/or PACM at the worksite.   On or about October 13, 2022, the employer did not determine the presence of of asbestos containing materials at the worksite before work began.  This condition exposed employees to a health hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3984

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346279045.