Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MATERIAL DIFFERENCE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MATERIAL DIFFERENCE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC in 6754 KIRBYVILLE STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77033 (NAICS 325991). OSHA activity number 346292345.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Material Difference Technologies, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Material Difference Technologies, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6754 KIRBYVILLE STREET
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77033
Mailing
6754 KIRBYVILLE STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77033
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325991
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Abate by
Apr 25, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,687 · Current $2,812 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:  a) At the facility, where employees had not received training to operate the Toyota forklifts, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2812
  • — Z (S) $4687

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Abate by
May 2, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  a) At the facility, where the employees had not been certified to operate Toyota forklifts, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 50 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Abate by
May 2, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,687 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    a) At the facility, the Toyota 42-6FGU15 forklift #5 with worn rear tires was not taken out of service.  b) At the facility, the Toyota 42-6FGU15 forklift #8 with worn rear tires was not taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4687

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,687 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:  a) At the warehouse, where employees were exposed to struck-by-hazards when using compressed air greater than 30 p.s.i for blowing dust off their clothing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4687

1910.212 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $5,626 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(5): Fan blade guards, where the periphery of the blades was less than seven feet above the floor or working level, had openings larger than one half inch:  a) At the Unloader 1 area, where a big fan was not provided with machine guards to protect employees from rotating blades.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5626
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Penalty
Initial $9,376 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:  a) At the K-3 area, the two sprocket wheels and chain on the shrink wrap machine were not guarded, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9376

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.303(g)(2)(i):  Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):  a) At the K-3 area near the shrink wrap machine, employees were exposed to electric shock hazards of approximately 110 volts when the control box was left open, exposing the wiring and live conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3750
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.304 G05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,984 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective:  a) At the Unloader 1 area, where employees were exposed to electrical hazards when an electrical cord missing a ground prong was used to power a stand-alone fan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3984

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,687 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  a) At the K-2 area, employees used an electrical safety switch box with a missing knockout, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4687

1910.38 E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Abate by
May 2, 2023
Penalty
Initial $877 · Current $526 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.38(e): The employer did not designate and train employees to assist in a safe and orderly evacuation of other employees:  a) At the facility, the employer had not designated and trained employees to assist others in evacuation, including evacuation route, muster points and ability to account for all employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $526
  • — Z (O) $877

1910.147 C04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2023
Abate by
May 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a) At the facility, written procedures were not developed for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees performed maintenance activities such as, but not limited to, fixing motor, or changing motor belt on multiple machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Material Difference Technologies, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346292345.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.