CHICAGO, IL —
OSHA Inspection: HILL MASONRY, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of HILL MASONRY, INC. in 3920 S. CALUMET AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60653 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346295421.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HILL MASONRY, INC.
- Site address
- 3920 S. CALUMET AVE.
- City
- CHICAGO
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60653
- Mailing
- 16848 SUSAN LANE, ORLAND PARK, IL 60467
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- May 24, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a. On or about May 24, 2023 - the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement dated that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 0100104/17/2023 01003b04/17/2023
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a. On or about October 20, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer failed to ensure that an employee operating a telehandler was adequately trained as demonstrated by the successful completion of a training and evaluation program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Feb 17, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $2,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a. On or about October 20, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee using a portable powered circular saw to cut masonry bricks was not utilizing eye protection, thereby exposing the employee to hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2300
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about October 20, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing masonry activities, approximately twenty-five (25) feet above ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about October 20, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing masonry operations, approximately twenty-five (25) feet above ground, were not provided with fall protection training, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.701 B
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $1,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement: a. On or about October 20, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing masonry operations around protruding ends of rebar that were not guarded were exposed to impalement hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1700
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.1052 C01
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a. On or about October 20, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, the stairway used to access and egress the working level was not equipped with at least one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge, thereby exposing employees to slips, trips, and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Feb 17, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section: a. On or about October 20, 2022, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was using a portable powered circular saw to cut masonry blocks that contained silica. The employer did not implement engineering controls, such as using an integrated water delivery system to minimize dust exposure, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $4688
More inspections at Hill Masonry, INC.
View Hill Masonry, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346295421.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.