WELLESLEY, MA —
OSHA Inspection: AREVALO CONSTRUCTION
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of AREVALO CONSTRUCTION in 100 LINDEN STREET, WELLESLEY, MA 02482 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346303696.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AREVALO CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 100 LINDEN STREET
- City
- WELLESLEY
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02482
- Mailing
- 228 SOUTH MAIN STREET, ATTLEBORO, MA 02703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $1,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Location: Roof The employer did not ensure that employees working on the roof were protected against falls of up to approximately 35 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1674.5
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.502 D06 III
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $1,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(iii):A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged (i) directly to webbing, rope or wire rope; (ii) to each other (iii) to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;(iv) to a horizontal lifeline; or (v) to any objectwhich is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snaphook keeper and release itself. Location: Roof, southwest part Two self-retracting lifelines were attached to the Dee-ring of one anchor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1674.5
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $2,344 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Location: Job site The employer did not train employees on the hazards of and protection against falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2344
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. Location: Job site The employer did not provide documentation that the employee exposed to fall hazards at the job site had received fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $1,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Location: Roof The extension ladder that was used to access the roof did not extend above the roof surface by at least 3 feet and was not secured to the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1674.5
- — Z (S) $3349
More inspections at Arevalo Construction
View Arevalo Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346303696.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.