PORTLAND, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: NORTH AMERICA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NORTH AMERICA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES in 64 BLUEBERRY RD, PORTLAND, ME 04102 (NAICS 562213). OSHA activity number 346306772.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NORTH AMERICA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
- Site address
- 64 BLUEBERRY RD
- City
- PORTLAND
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04102
- Mailing
- 1240 SARATOGA ROAD, BALLSTON SPA, NY 12020
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562213
- Employees
- 1443
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $14,063 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. Establishment - The employer did not ensure that an employee was medically evaluated to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator prior to the required to use of the 3M 6800 respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $14063
- · Z (S) $14063
1910.134 E06 I
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(6)(i):The employer did not obtain from the physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP) a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator. Establishment - The employer did not ensure that temporary employees working for the employer, were medically evaluated to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $14,063 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. Establishment - The employer did not ensure employees, including temporary employees working for the employer, were fit tested for 3M 6800 and 6000 respirators prior to use.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $14063
- · Z (S) $14063
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562213)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 346306772.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.