Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PHIL SLACK DBA P & G ENGINEERING COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PHIL SLACK DBA P & G ENGINEERING COMPANY in 828 N. YORK RD., ELMHURST, IL 60126 (NAICS 532412). OSHA activity number 346318942.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Phil Slack DBA P & G Engineering Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Phil Slack DBA P & G Engineering Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
828 N. YORK RD.
City
ELMHURST
State
IL
ZIP
60126
Mailing
11924 S. 88TH AVE., PALOS PARK, IL 60464
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
532412
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2022
Abate by
Jan 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,315 · Current $3,500
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about November 2, 2022, employees working around a crane with suspended loads were not wearing hard hats, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.  Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3500
  • — C (S) $3315
  • — Z (S) $3315

1926.1425 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2022
Abate by
Jan 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1425(b): While the operator was not moving the suspended load, no employee shall be within the fall zone, except those employees engaged in; (b)(1): hooking, unhooking or guiding a load; (b)(2) initial attachment of the load to a component or structure or (b)(3) operating a concrete hopper or bucket.   On or about November 2, 2022, an employee engaged in steel erection was walking/ working under suspended loads, exposing the employee to a struck-by hazard.  Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.251 A02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2022
Abate by
Jan 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.251(a)(2)(i):The employer failed to ensure rigging equipment had permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer that indicate the recommended safe working load.  On or about November 2, 2022, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards as wire rope rigging did not have permanently affixed tags/markings to identify recommended safe working loads.  Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3500
  • — C (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.1425 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2022
Abate by
Jan 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1425(c)(2): The employer did not make sure that hooks with self-closing latches were used while employees were hooking, unhooking, or guiding the load.  On or about November 2, 2022, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards as self-locking latches were not used to hoist steel decking into place.  Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.1425 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2022
Abate by
Jan 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1425(c)(3):29 CFR 1926.1425(c)(3): The materials were not rigged by a qualified rigger.  On or about November 2, 2022, an employee rigging loads to a crane was not a qualified rigger, exposing the employees to struck-by hazards.  Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2022
Abate by
Jan 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about November 2, 2022, an employee engaged in steel erection and working at heights exceeding 25 feet was not trained to recognize or minimize fall exposures, exposing employees to a fall.  Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2500
  • — C (S) $4144
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.760 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 22, 2022
Abate by
Jan 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $5,801 · Current $4,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.760(a)(1):Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level was not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, or fall restraint systems.  On or about November 2, 2022, an employee engaged in steel erection was not protected from a fall, exposing the employee to a fall of greater than 25 feet.  Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4500
  • — C (S) $5801
  • — Z (S) $5801

View Phil Slack DBA P & G Engineering Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346318942.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.