BEDFORD, NH —
OSHA Inspection: METALLICA STEEL, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of METALLICA STEEL, INC. in 451 S RIVER ROAD, BEDFORD, NH 03110 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346321292.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- METALLICA STEEL, INC.
- Site address
- 451 S RIVER ROAD
- City
- BEDFORD
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03110
- Mailing
- 91 FALCON RD, LIVINGSTON, NJ 07039
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. Site- Employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program where employees working at the site were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the worksite by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Site- Employees working from a Snorkel TB-60RCU aerial lift were not protected from a fall hazard where fall protection was not worn.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Site- Employees working from a Snorkel TB-60RCU aerial lift were not provided with operator training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Site - The employer did not have an adequate training program related to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system: Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 25 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l): Site- An employee operating a Lull 644E-42 all-terrain forklift was not provided with a performance evaluation within 3 years of initial powered industrial truck training.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Metallica Steel, INC.
View Metallica Steel, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346321292.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.