Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EDWARD JANUSZ DBA EJ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDWARD JANUSZ DBA EJ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC. in 1301 W TOUHY AVE., PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346325178.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Edward Janusz DBA EJ General Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Edward Janusz DBA EJ General Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1301 W TOUHY AVE.
City
PARK RIDGE
State
IL
ZIP
60068
Mailing
3900 W. CORTLAND STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60647
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 1, 2023
Abate by
Jun 21, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated.  a) Edward Janusz dba EJ General Construction Inc. failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:   Citation Number, Item Number, Abatement Date  Citation 1, Item 1 1926.100(a) Citation 1, Item 2a 1926.451(d)(3)(ix) Citation 1, Item 2b 1926.451(d)(3)(x) Citation 1, Item 3 1926.451(d)(5)(ii) Citation 1, Item 4a 1926.451(d)(16) Citation 1, Item 4b 1926.451(d)(17) Citation 1, Item 5 1926.451(g)(3)(i) Citation 1, Item 6 1926.451(g)(4)(iii)  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET)
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.100(a):  Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  a)  On November 3, 2022, employees were not wearing protective helmets where there was a possible danger of head injury from falling objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.451 D03 IX

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.451(d)(3)(ix):  Tiebacks were not secured to a structurally sound anchorage on the building or structure.   a)  On November 3, 2022, the two-point suspension scaffolding that the employer provided for employee use did not have the cornice hooks tiebacks secured to a structurally sound point of anchorage on the building.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.451 D03 X

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(d)(3)(x):  Tiebacks were not installed perpendicular to the face of the building or structure, and opposing angle tiebacks were also not installed.   a)  On November 3, 2022, the two-point suspension scaffolding that the employer provided for employee use did not have tiebacks installed perpendicular to the face of the building nor did it have opposing angle tiebacks.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 D05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.451(d)(5)(ii):  Suspension scaffold support devices such as cornice hooks, roof hooks, roof irons, parapet clamps, or similar devices were not supported by bearing blocks;  a)  On November 3, 2022, employees were working from a two-point suspension scaffold where the right and left cornice hooks were not supported by bearing blocks.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.451 D16

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.451(d)(16):  Suspension scaffold power-operated hoists or manually operated hoists did not have a braking device or locking pawl which engages automatically when a hoist makes either of the following uncontrolled movements: an instantaneous change in momentum or an accelerated over-speed:    a)  On November 3, 2022, the employer provided for employee use a two-point suspension scaffold which did not have a braking device or locking pawl.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.451 D17

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(d)(17):  Manually operated hoists did not have a positive crank force to descend:    a)  On November 3, 2022, the employer provided for employee use a two-point suspension scaffold where the manually operated hoist did not have a positive crank force to descend.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(3)(i):  Vertical lifelines were not fastened to a fixed safe point of anchorage, independent of the scaffolding, and protected from sharp edges and abrasion.  a)  On November 3, 2022, the employer provided for employee use vertical life lines for a two-point suspension scaffold that was not protected from abrasion when placed over the side/ edge of the roof to the scaffolding below and was anchored to a cast iron plumbing ventilation pipe.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.451 G04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(4)(iii):  Midrails, screens, mesh or equivalent structural members shall be installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the scaffold platform:  a)  On November 3, 2022, employees were working from a two-point suspension scaffold platform without the midrail installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the scaffold platform.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

View Edward Janusz DBA EJ General Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346325178.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.