Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AFSCO FENCE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AFSCO FENCE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. in 185 TROY SCHENECTADY RD., LATHAM, NY 12110 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 346325988.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Afsco Fence Supply Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Afsco Fence Supply Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
185 TROY SCHENECTADY RD.
City
LATHAM
State
NY
ZIP
12110
Mailing
PO BOX 98, LATHAM, NY 12110
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2023
Abate by
Mar 6, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $4,063 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator ESLI that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:     (a) On or about 11/04/2022, at Paint Shop, for the gate builder wearing 3M half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges while spraying MASTER-HALCO black acrylic paint on gates containing hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone and xylene.  The employees were not provided a cartridge changeout schedule prior to being required to wear the respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4062.5
  • — C (S) $6250
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2023
Abate by
Mar 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      (a) On or about 11/04/2022, at Paint Shop, for the gate builder wearing 3M half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges while spraying MASTER-HALCO black acrylic paint on gates containing hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone and xylene.  The employee was not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2023
Abate by
Feb 21, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):  The employer permitted respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face:    (a) On or about 11/04/2022, at Paint Shop, for the gate builder wearing 3M half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges while spraying MASTER-HALCO black acrylic paint on gates containing hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone and xylene.  The employer did not implement procedure to prevent facial hair on respirator users.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2023
Abate by
Feb 21, 2023
Penalty
Initial $7,813 · Current $5,078 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  (a) On or about 11/04/2022, at welding and paint area, for the employees working with/around the welder and gate builder spraying MASTER-HALCO black acrylic paint on gates containing hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, welding fumes, acetone and xylene.  Employer did not have safety data sheets available.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5078.45
  • — C (S) $7813
  • — Z (S) $7813

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2023
Abate by
Mar 6, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) On or about 11/04/2022, at welding and paint area, for the welder and gate builder spraying MASTER-HALCO black acrylic paint on gates containing hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, welding fumes, acetone and xylene.  Employer did not train employees on hazard communication.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2023
Abate by
Mar 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $7,813 · Current $4,688 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  a) On or about 11/4/2022, at jobsite, for the site foreman, site supervisor, in-house mechanic, yard, and yard foreman working with earthmoving equipment such as, but not limited to, skid steers and dandy diggers loading on trailer, unloading off trailer, and installing fencing.  The employer never provided training to employees so that they may recognize and avoid the hazards that were present on site.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $4687.8
  • — C (S) $7813
  • — Z (S) $7813

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2023
Abate by
Mar 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  The employer did not ensure that employees using tight fitting face piece respirators pass an appropriate qualitative or quantitative fit test prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.   (a) On or about 11/04/2022, at Paint Shop, for the gate builder wearing 3M half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges while spraying MASTER-HALCO black acrylic paint on gates containing hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, acetone and xylene.  The employees were not fit tested, either qualitatively or quantitatively, prior to being required to use this respirator by the employer.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346325988.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.