Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPRINLY, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SPRINLY, INC. in 12555 ROCKSIDE ROAD, CLEVELAND, OH 44125 (NAICS 722330). OSHA activity number 346332844.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sprinly, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sprinly, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SPRINLY, INC.
Site address
12555 ROCKSIDE ROAD
City
CLEVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
44125
Mailing
12555 ROCKSIDE ROAD, CLEVELAND, OH 44125
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
722330
Employees
43
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2023
Abate by
Mar 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $7,813 · Current $5,469 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  On or about October 28, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that some form of effective guarding was being utilized on the YF Super Sealer (Model ET-2A3), to protect employees from hazards such as but not limited to the moving parts and ingoing nip points.  Employees were exposed to hot parts and the embossing roll system, as the sealing area door was not being kept closed and latched while in operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5469.1
  • — Z (S) $7813

1910.305 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,687 · Current $2,344 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Openings through which conductors entered cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  On or about October 28, 2022, the employer exposed employees to an electrical hazard, in that the employer did not ensure that the openings, in which conductors entered, the120-volt receptacle, used over the production table, were effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2343.5
  • — Z (S) $4687

1910.305 B01 III A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
1910.305(b)(1)(iii)(A): The employer did not ensure that each cable is fastened within 305 mm (12 in.) of the outer end of the raceway, measured along the sheath:  On or about October 28, 2022, the employer exposed employees to an electrical hazard, in that the employer did not ensure that the raceway of the 120-volt receptacle, used over the production table, was fastened within 12 inches of the outer end of the raceway.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B08 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(8)(i): Electrical equipment was not firmly secured to the surface on which it was mounted:  On or about October 28, 2022, the employer exposed employees to an electrical hazard, in that the employer did not ensure that the 120-volt receptacle, used over the production table, was firmly secured to the surface on which it is mounted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2023
Abate by
Apr 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  On or about November 9, 2022, the written workplace hazard assessment was not certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment (PPE):  On or about November 9, 2022, the employer failed to provide PPE training to employees. The employer provides employees with PPE including, but not limited to safety glasses and gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   On or about November 9, 2022, the employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program was developed or implemented. Employees were exposed to fire and contact hazards when using hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to: Propane, Clorox, and Tsunami 100.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   On or about November 9, 2022, the employer did not provide hazard communication training to employees. Employees work with chemicals including, but not limited to: Propane, Clorox, and Tsunami 100.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346332844.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.