THOMASTON, CT —
OSHA Inspection: J & J PRECISION, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J & J PRECISION, INC. in 116 WATERBURY ROAD, THOMASTON, CT 06787 (NAICS 339112). OSHA activity number 346337744.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J & J PRECISION, INC.
- Site address
- 116 WATERBURY ROAD
- City
- THOMASTON
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06787
- Mailing
- 116 WATERBURY ROAD, THOMASTON, CT 06787
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339112
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
16 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A03
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that employees wearing prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involve eye hazards wears eye protection that incorporates the prescription in its design or wears eye protection that can be worn over the prescription lenses: Press Room: On, or about, November 30, 2022, an employee who set-up and ran mechanical power presses wore regular prescription glasses that were not safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $4351
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $6,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts, reciprocating parts and in-running nip points: Press Room, Press #33: On, or about, November 4, 2022, safeguarding was not provided on the rotating and reciprocating parts and in-running nip points of the stock feeder located on the left side of the press.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $6000
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $4351
1910.217 B07 IV B
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,252 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(7)(iv)(b): The "inch" single control was not located so that the worker cannot reach into the point of operation while operating the single control: Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, the following partial revolution mechanical power presses were provided with a single jog/inch control that was located within the reach of pinch points in the die area: A. Press #26, Bliss. B. Press #22, Perkins. C. Press #40, Minster. D. Press #17, Niagara. E. Press #53, Niagara.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $7252
1910.217 B07 VIII
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(7)(viii):Mechanical power press(es) using part revolution clutches, with clutch/brake control systems which contained both single and continuous functions, were not designed so that in order to initiate a continuous run, a prior action or decision by the operator in addition to the selection of Continuous on the stroking selector, before actuation of the operating means will result in continuous stroking: Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, the following partial revolution mechanical power presses were provided with both single stroke and continuous modes. The presses were not provided with a continuous arming control or other effective means to prevent the presses from being initiated in continuous stroking without an additional step by the operator: A. Press #26, Bliss. B. Press #47, Bliss. C. Press #24, Bliss. D. Press #23, Minster.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 B07 XV
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(7)(xv): In order to bar the press, a separate pushbutton was not employed to activate the clutch with the driver motor de-energized: Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, Press #47, a Bliss partial revolution mechanical power press, was not provided with a separate bar control to disengage the motor while using a turnover bar.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 C01 I
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $7,252 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es): Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, the following partial revolution mechanical power presses were not provided with safeguarding to protect employees from the die area of the press: A. Press #54, Minster. B. Press #25, Southbend. C. Press #58, Minster. D. Press #47, Bliss. E. Press #53, Niagara.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $6000
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $7252
1910.217 C02 I A
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $7,252 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(2)(i)(a): Point of operation guard(s) on mechanical power press(es) did not prevent entry of hands or fingers into the point of operation by reaching through, over, under or around the guard(s): Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, the following partial revolution mechanical power presses were provided with expanded metal barrier guards that hung in front of the press and did not prevent entry from the sides of the press: A. Press #33, Bliss. B. Press #22, Perkins. C. Press #17, Niagara. D. Press #46, Bliss. E. Press #24, Bliss. F. Press #23, Minster.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $6000
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $7252
1910.217 C02 I D
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(2)(i)(d):Point of operation guard(s) on mechanical power press(es) did not utilized fasteners not readily removable by the operator, so as to create minimize the possibility of misuse or removal of essential parts: Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, the following partial revolution mechanical power presses had barrier guards that were secured with T-handled fasteners: A. Press #54, Minster. B. Press #55, Minster.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 C02 III
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(2)(iii): Fixed barrier guard(s) on mechanical power press(es) were not attached securely to the frame of the press or to the bolster plate: Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, the following partial revolution mechanical power presses were provided with expanded metal barrier guards that hung in front of the press on hooks and were not affixed to the press: A. Press #33, Bliss. B. Press #22, Perkins. C. Press #17, Niagara. D. Press #46, Bliss. E. Press #24, Bliss. F. Press #23, Minster.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 D09 I
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $5,801 · Current $6,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(i): The employer did not establish a die setting procedure for mechanical power press(es) that would ensure compliance with 29 CFR 1910.217(c): Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, the employer had not established die-setting procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.217(c). Several partial revolution mechanical power presses were provided with single jog/inch controls and at least one other press had to be started before the guard could be place in front of the die area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $5801
1910.217 D09 II
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(ii): Spring loaded turnover bars were not provided for mechanical power press(es) designed to accept such turnover bars: Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, non-spring-loaded turnover bars were used to position mechanical power presses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 D09 IV
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(iv): Safety blocks were not used when mechanical power press die(s) were being adjusted or repaired in the press: Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, safety blocks were not used when employees changed inserts or addressed issues with press tooling while it was mounted in mechanical power presses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.217 E01 I
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $6,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i): A program of periodic and regular inspections of mechanical power press(es) was not established and followed to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguards were in a safe operating condition and adjustment: Company: On, or about, November 30, 2022, the employer had not established a program and periodic and regular mechanical power press inspections. Abatement Note: In addition to maintaining documented inspections, a record of repairs and modifications to each press is required to be maintained.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $4351
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,252 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in in-patient hospitalization, amputation or the loss of an eye: Company: On, or about, November 4, 2022, the employer did not report a serious hand injury involving a partial amputation that occurred on October 17, 2022 within 24 hours of the occurrence.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $7252
1910.217 G01
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(g)(1): The employer did not, within 30 days of the occurrence, report to either the Director of the Directorate of Safety Standards Programs, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. 20210, or the State agency administering a plan approved by the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, all point of operation injuries to operators or other employees: Company: On, or about, December 1, 2022, the employer did not report an injury involving a mechanical power press to OSHA's National Office within 30 days of the occurrence. The injury occurred on October 17, 2022.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.217 B12
- Issued
- Dec 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(12): All pressure vessels used in conjunction with power presses did not conform to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code for Pressure Vessels, 1968 Edition: Ref. 1968 ASME BPVC, Section VII, UG-115, UG-116 and UG-125 Press Room: On, or about, November 4, 2022, the tanks provided on the following mechanical power presses were not compliant with ASME requirements: A. Press #46, Bliss. The air tank provided on the back of the press was not provided with a pressure relief valve. B. Press #24, Bliss. The air tank provided on the side of the press was not provided with an ASME stamp/identification plate and was not equipped with a pressure relief valve. C. Press #53, Niagara. A pressure relief valve was not provided on the lower air tank mounted on the rear of the press.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at J & J Precision, INC.
View J & J Precision, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339112)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346337744.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.