Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DANA SEALING MANUFACTURING, LLC DBA DANA INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DANA SEALING MANUFACTURING, LLC DBA DANA INC. in 1201 E. VICTOR DANA ROAD, ROBINSON, IL 62454 (NAICS 336390). OSHA activity number 346338031.

Watch Dana Sealing Manufacturing, LLC DBA Dana INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dana Sealing Manufacturing, LLC DBA Dana INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1201 E. VICTOR DANA ROAD
City
ROBINSON
State
IL
ZIP
62454
Mailing
1201 E. VICTOR DANA ROAD, ROBINSON, IL 62454
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336390
Employees
141
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11162.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section:  Dana Sealing Manufacturing, LLC at 1201 East Dana Victor Road, Robinson, IL 62454:  On or about 11-1-22, employees performed or were affected by service and maintenance activities on industrial coating equipment.  The employer did not develop hazardous energy control procedures specific to the serviced equipment such as but not limited to, the 947 Coater, 597 Coater and the P1 Coater.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $11162
  • — Z (S) $11162

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11162.00 · Current $11162.00
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i):The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed:  Dana Sealing Manufacturing, LLC dba Dana Inc. at 1201 East Victor Dana Road, Robinson, IL 62454  On or about 11-01-22, the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedures for its "BLACK" 597 Coater, 947 Coater and the 998 Coater, to ensure that this standard was being followed.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $11162
  • — C (S) $11162
  • — Z (S) $11162

1910.147 C07 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $15625.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): The employer did not ensure that each authorized employee received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.  Dana Sealing Manufacturing, LLC dba Dana Inc. at 1201 East Victor Dana Road, Robinson, IL 62454.  On or about 11-01-22, the employer did not ensure that each authorized employee received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control while servicing equipment such as, but not limited to the "BLACK" 597 Coater.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $15625
  • — Z (S) $15625

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): Specific procedural steps were not developed for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:  Dana Sealing Manufacturing, LLC at 1201 East Dana Victor Road, Robinson, IL 62454:  On or about 11-1-22, the employer's specific procedural steps detailed in the 3500 Roll Coater Standardized Work Chart component of the energy control procedure (Lockout Procedure) did not provide safe instructions to control the hazardous energy prior to the employees being exposed to hazardous component movement.  The procedural step in Seq. No. 2 directed the employee to, "Open the guards on the front of the coater."  when it should have directed employees to "Open the guards on the back of the coater."
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C04 II D

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The employer did not have specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures:   On or about 11-1-22, the employers 3500 Roll Coater energy control procedures (Lockout Procedure) did not include any specific requirements for testing, determining and verifying the effectiveness of the applied energy control measures.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $15625.00 · Current $15625.00
29 CFR  1910.147(d): Application of control. The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the following elements and actions and shall be done in the following sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):  Dana Sealing Manufacturing, LLC dba Dana Inc. at 1201 East Victor Dana Road, Robinson, IL 62454  On or about 11-01-22, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts creating physical hazards during servicing and cleaning of the "BLACK" 597 Coater. The employer failed to implement the general energy control application steps, included in the employers Energy Control (Lockout/Tagout) Program, as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements]. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $15625
  • — C (S) $15625
  • — Z (S) $15625

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346338031.