Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PRYCO, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PRYCO, INC. in 301 GARVEY, MECHANICSBURG, IL 62545 (NAICS 336310). OSHA activity number 346342397.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pryco, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pryco, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PRYCO, INC.
Site address
301 GARVEY
City
MECHANICSBURG
State
IL
ZIP
62545
Mailing
P.O BOX 108, MECHANICSBURG, IL 62545
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336310
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2023
Abate by
Feb 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.106(e)(2)(ii):  Flammable liquids were not stored in tanks or closed containers:  On or about November 15, 2022, employees were exposed to fire hazards and employer had not ensured flammable liquids were stored in closed containers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3750
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2023
Penalty
Initial $9,376 · Current $5,626 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(5)(i): There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained:  On or about November 15, 2022, the employer had not ensured:  a.  the paint booth located on the left side of the paint area had a functioning as designed manometer to ensure required air velocity was maintained by indicating when filter replacement is required. b.  the paint booth located on the right side of the paint area had a functioning as designed manometer to ensure required air velocity was maintained by indicating when filter replacement is required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5625.6
  • — Z (S) $9376

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(5)(iv):  Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers:   On or about November 15, 2022, the employer had not ensured:  a.  the paint booth located on the left side of the paint area had an approved automatic sprinkler system on the downstream and upstream sides of the filters exposing employees to explosion and fire hazards. b.  the paint booth located on the right side of the paint area had an approved automatic sprinkler system on the downstream and upstream sides of the filters exposing employees to explosion and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3750
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(g)(2):  All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:  On or about November 15, 2022, the employer had not ensured:  a. the paint spray booth located on the left side was cleaned as needed to keep paint spray booth free of deposited combustible residue. b. the paint spray booth located on the right side was cleaned as needed to keep paint spray booth free of deposited combustible residue.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,938 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about November 15, 2022, and at times thereafter, the employer had not developed and implemented a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures for respirator use that included all provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix).  The employer required employees to wear respirators throughout their shifts while exposed to Xylene, Acetone, N-Butane, Ethylbenzene, N-Butyl Acetate, Ethyl Acetate, and Aliphatic Hydrocarbon.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $10938

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):  The employer had not provided a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about November 15, 2022, and times thereafter, the employer had not provided a medical evaluation to determine each employee's ability to use a respirator before requiring the use.  The employer required employees to wear respirators throughout their shifts while exposed to Xylene, Acetone, N-Butane, Ethylbenzene, N-Butyl Acetate, Titanium Dioxide, Ethyl Acetate, and Aliphatic Hydrocarbon.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about November 15, 2022 and at times thereafter, the employer had not provided a fit test to all employees required to wear respirators.  The employer required employees to wear respirators throughout their shifts while exposed to Xylene, Acetone, N-Butane, Ethylbenzene, N-Butyl Acetate, Titanium Dioxide, Ethyl Acetate, and Aliphatic Hydrocarbon.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Pryco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346342397.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.