Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CYPRESS CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of CYPRESS CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC in 10550 ROSE BUD COURT, MCKINNEY, TX 75070 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346370000.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cypress Contracting Services LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cypress Contracting Services LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10550 ROSE BUD COURT
City
MCKINNEY
State
TX
ZIP
75070
Mailing
10332 FRANKLIN DR, PROVIDENCE VILLAGE, TX 76227
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2023
Abate by
Jun 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) On or about December 1, 2022, at the jobsite, an employee was not wearing a hard hat while working underneath another employee  attempting to install a metal rake on a roof edge.  The employee on the ground was exposed to struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2023
Abate by
Jun 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.416(a)(1):Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:  (a) On or about December 1, 2022, and at times prior thereto, at the jobsite, employees installing metal roofing sheets and metal rake trim pieces in proximity to an overhead powerline were exposed to electrocution hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.416 A03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2023
Abate by
Jun 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.416(a)(3): When and where energized circuits existed, the employer failed to post and maintain proper warning signs, advise employees of the location, hazard involved and the proper protective measures to be taken:   (a) On or about December 1, 2022, and at times prior thereto, at the jobsite, employees installing metal roofing sheets and metal rake trim pieces in proximity to an overhead powerline were not advised of the electrocution hazard and the protective measures they could take.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2023
Abate by
Jun 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10):Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system:  (a) On or about December 1, 2022, and at times prior thereto, at the jobsite, employees installing metal roofing sheets and metal rake trim pieces on the roof of the building did not have any type of fall protection system, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.602 C01 VIII A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2023
Abate by
Jun 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.602(c)(1)(viii)(A): The industrial truck was not equipped with a safety platform/cage firmly secured to the lifting carriage and/or forks when used for lifting personnel:  a) On or about December 1, 2022, at the jobsite, employees were using a Hyundai forklift to raise an employee to the roof edge in order to install a metal rake trim piece.  The employee was standing on the forks of the forklift and was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2023
Abate by
Jun 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  (a) On or about December 1, 2022, and at times prior thereto, at the jobsite, employees installing metal roofing sheets and metal rake trim pieces were utilizing a ladder that did not extend three feet above the landing surface exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346370000.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.