Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TRIMAC TRANSPORTATION INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of TRIMAC TRANSPORTATION INC. in 2401 INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY, LA PORTE, TX 77571 (NAICS 484121). OSHA activity number 346370265.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Trimac Transportation INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Trimac Transportation INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2401 INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY
City
LA PORTE
State
TX
ZIP
77571
Mailing
2401 INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY, LA PORTE, TX 77571
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484121
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $8,929 · Current $8,929

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR  1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employee's hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:   (a)  At the facility, tank cleaning bay area, the employer did not ensure that personal protective equipment such as 15 mil nitrile gloves were provided to all employees who clean tanks containing Formaldehyde residuals.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $8929
  • — C (S) $8929
  • — Z (S) $8929

1910.305 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.305(c)(4):  Snap switches mounted in boxes shall have faceplates installed so as to completely cover the opening and seat against the finished surface:  (a)  Tank wash area ticket office, a light switch did not have a faceplate installed, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposed an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service:  (a)  At the ticket office, the flexible cord powering a relocatable power tap was frayed, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $15,625 · Current $13,394 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:   (a)  At the tank cleaning bay area, where employees were not trained on the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.  Employees clean  tanks containing hazardous substances including, but not limited to,  xylene and naphtha.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $13394
  • — C (S) $15625
  • — Z (S) $15625

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $111,616 · Current $30,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i)-(ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a)  At the facility, where the written respiratory protection program had not been implemented.  Employees are required by the employer to wear respiratory protection when cleaning tanks containing hydrocarbons, formaldehyde and benzene.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $30000
  • — C (W) $111616
  • — Z (W) $111616

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $30,000
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) At the facility, employees were not provided medical evaluations prior to being required to use respirators in the workplace.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $30000
  • — C (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $30,000

Hazardous substances 0040137118102280

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:  (a) At the work site, where employees required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator had not been fit tested annually.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $30000
  • — C (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $11,162 · Current $5,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0040137118102280

29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  (a)  At the tank cleaning bay area, the employer did not perform a reasonable estimate of employee exposure to respiratory hazards, such as, but not limited to, xylene and naphtha.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (W) $11162
  • — Z (W) $11162

1910.1028 E02 I

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $5,000

Hazardous substances 0320

29 CFR  1910.1028(e)(2)(i):  The employer did not monitor each workplace and work operation to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of benzene to which employees may be exposed:  (a) At the tank cleaning bay area, the employer did not monitor the work operations of employees washing benzene tanks to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of benzene to which the employees were exposed.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

1910.1048 D01 I

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $5,000

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR  1910.1048(d)(1)(i): Employees of a workplace covered by this standard were not monitored to determine their exposure to formaldehyde:  (a) At the tank cleaning bay area, where employees washing formaldehyde tanks had not been monitored to determine their exposure to formaldehyde.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5000
  • — C (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

View Trimac Transportation INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346370265.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.