OSHA Inspection: DIEGO ANDRES

Issued

Dec 14, 2022

Abate by

Jan 11, 2023

Penalty

Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  The employer was failing to protect employees from eye or face injuries. This was most recently documented on December 7, 2022 at 10415 South 191st Street, Omaha, Nebraska. The employer failed to protect multiple employees from laceration hazards when using pneumatic nail guns for framing construction work.

Issued

Dec 14, 2022

Penalty

Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  The employer was failing to protect employees from falls. This was most recently documented on December 7, 2022 at 10415 South 191st Street, Omaha, Nebraska. The employer failed to protect multiple employees from fall hazards when performing framing construction work at a height greater than 6 feet.

Issued

Dec 14, 2022

Abate by

Feb 2, 2023

Penalty

Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards, which would enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  The employer was failing to protect employees from falls. This was most recently documented on December 7, 2022 at 10415 South 191st Street, Omaha, Nebraska. The employer failed to train employees on the recognition of fall hazards and the methods to mitigate these hazards.

Issued

Dec 14, 2022

Abate by

Jan 11, 2023

Penalty

Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76cm), whichever was less, were not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  The employer was failing to protect employees from falls. This was most recently documented on December 7, 2022 at 10415 South 191st Street, Omaha, Nebraska. The employer failed to protect multiple employees from fall hazards when using stairways that had four or more risers to access the second level of the residential construction site.