Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BADGERLAND DISPOSAL, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BADGERLAND DISPOSAL, LLC in 7102 US HIGHWAY 12, MADISON, WI 53718 (NAICS 562998). OSHA activity number 346379381.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Badgerland Disposal, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Badgerland Disposal, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7102 US HIGHWAY 12
City
MADISON
State
WI
ZIP
53718
Mailing
2185 SOUTH DANNY ROAD, NEW BERLIN, WI 53146
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562998
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.30 A03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2023
Abate by
Nov 13, 2023
Penalty
Initial $14,063 · Current $8,965 Reduced
1910.30(a)(3)(i):  The employer must train each employee in the nature of the fall hazards in the work area and how to recognize them:   On or about December 7, 2022, an employee had not been trained on the nature of the fall hazard when changing springs on a screen without fall protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $8965
  • — C (S) $14063
  • — Z (S) $14063

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 90009130

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about December 07, 2022, it was mandatory for employees to wear N95 filtering face piece respirators when working in the Construction and Demo Screen building and sort line building and employees did not have a medical evaluation before wearing a N95 filtering face piece respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 90009130

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about December 07, 2022, it was mandatory for employees to wear N95 filtering face piece respirators when working in the Construction and Demo Screen building and sort line building and employees did not have a respirator fit test before wearing a N95 filtering face piece respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346379381.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.