TOTOWA, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: ROYAL PACKAGING, LLC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ROYAL PACKAGING, LLC in 50 MALTESE DRIVE, TOTOWA, NJ 07512 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 346395635.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROYAL PACKAGING, LLC
- Site address
- 50 MALTESE DRIVE
- City
- TOTOWA
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07512
- Mailing
- 50 MALTESE DRIVE, TOTOWA, NJ 07512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493110
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $12,031 · Current $0 Reduced
E101E200
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to dust deflagration, explosion, or other fire hazard, while emptying wheat starch into sifting processing equipment: a) Packing Line #2 (Wheat Starch): On or about 12/16/22, employees were exposed to fire, and explosion hazards, from accumulations of explosive dust (wheat starch), present on and around a shaker screen equipment used to remove impurities from starch. Fugitive wheat starch dust was collected to determine explosive properties. Test results show that wheat starch is a Class II dust and is explosive, with a Kst = 28.70 bar*meters/second, and an explosion severity of 0.94, which is above 0.5.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $12031
- — Z (S) $12031
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,875 · Current $3,438 Reduced
E101E200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): 29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that all places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces are kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition. a) Packing Line #2: Explosive wheat starch dust with a Kst of 28.70 bar meter/second, measuring greater than 1/32 inch thickness, accumulated on and around sifting processing equipment, electrical outlet, on the platform railings, ducts, and an electrical panel box, of the packing room. The employer did not ensure that the work area was kept free of dust accumulations from processing equipment, and electrical equipment, thus exposing employees to a fire and explosion hazard, on or about 12/16/22.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $3437.5
- — C (S) $6875
- — Z (S) $6875
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
E101E200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that the floor of each workroom is maintained in a clean and, to the extent feasible, in a dry condition. The employer did not ensure that when wet processes are used, drainage is be maintained and, to the extent feasible, dry standing places, such as false floors, platforms, and mats are provided: a) Packing Line #2: Explosive wheat starch dust with a Kst of 28.70 bar meter/second, measuring greater than 1/32 inch thickness, accumulated on the floor of the packing room. The employer did not ensure that the work area was kept free of accumulations of fugitive dust from processing equipment, thus exposing employees to a fire and explosion hazard, on or about 12/16/22.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.145 C03
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $5,156 · Current $2,578 Reduced
E200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.145(c)(3): Safety instruction sign(s) were not used where there was a need for general instructions and suggestions relative to safety measure(s): a) Packing Room #2 (Wheat Starch): The employer did not post signage, alerting employees of general instructions and suggestions relative to combustible dust hazards, on or about 12/16/22.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $2578
- — C (S) $5156
- — Z (S) $5156
1910.178 C02 VI A
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $8,595 · Current $4,298 Reduced
E101E200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(c)(2)(vi)(a): The employer did not provide powered industrial trucks designated as EX for use in an atmosphere in which combustible dust is or may be in suspension continuously, intermittently, or periodically under normal operating conditions, in quantities sufficient to produce explosive or ignitable mixtures, or where mechanical failure or abnormal operation of machinery or equipment might cause such mixtures to be produced: a) Facility-Wide: Employees were operating a Crown propane powered forklift truck, in a Class II, Division 1 location, in an area where explosive wheat starch was packaged. The wheat starch has a Kst= 28.70 bar*meters/second, which is a Class II dust and explosive. The employer did not ensure that approved powered industrial trucks, designated as EX, was used in an atmosphere that contain explosive dust, on or about 12/16/22.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $4297.5
- — C (S) $8595
- — Z (S) $8595
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,875 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) Plant-Wide: Employees were operating Crown propane powered forklift trucks and pallet jacks, to transport products, including, but not limited to, corn starch, tapioca starch, and wheat starch, throughout the plant, and did not complete training, prior to operating powered industrial trucks. The employer did not ensure that employees successfully completed training, prior to being allowed to operate powered industrial trucks and equipment, on or about 12/16/22.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $6875
- — Z (S) $6875
1910.307 C
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $12,031 · Current $6,016 Reduced
E101E200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(c): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location: a) Packing Line #2 (Wheat Starch): A motor fan which powers an augur, electrical outlet, propane powered forklift truck, and an electrical disconnect switch box, located in a Class II, Division 1, location, were not intrinsically safe, and approved for a Class II, Division 1 location, on or about 12/16/22.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $6015.5
- — C (S) $12031
- — Z (S) $12031
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $5,156 · Current $2,578 Reduced
E200M110
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Facility-Wide: Employees were working with hazardous chemicals and substances, including, but not limited to, corn starch, tapioca starch, and wheat starch. Test results show that wheat starch has a Kst = 28.70 bar* meters/second, which is a Class II dust and is explosive. The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program, on or about 12/16/22.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $2578
- — C (S) $5156
- — Z (S) $5156
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
E101E200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Facility-Wide: Employees are required to work with hazardous chemicals and combustible dust substances, including, but not limited to, corn starch, wheat starch, and tapioca starch. The employer did not provide training on the safe methods to follow when working with hazardous chemicals and substances, at the time of initial hire, on or about 12/16/22.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
E200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: a) Facility-Wide: Employees are required to work with hazardous chemicals and combustible dust substances, including, but not limited to, corn starch, wheat starch, and tapioca starch. The employer did not provide training on the physical and health hazards associated with combustible starch dust, on or about 12/16/22.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493110)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346395635.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.