Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M PINGUIL GENERAL CORP

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of M PINGUIL GENERAL CORP in 5 NASHUA ROAD, LONDONDERRY, NH 03038 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346404700.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M Pinguil General Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M Pinguil General Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5 NASHUA ROAD
City
LONDONDERRY
State
NH
ZIP
03038
Mailing
36 STANLEY STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2023
Abate by
May 15, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No.1 Item No(s). 1, 2 and 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 16, 2023.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Jan 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,554 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Site- Employees working beneath roofing work were not protected from head injuries where head protection was not worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1554
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Jan 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,554 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Site- An employee operating a pneumatic nail gun was not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1554
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,176 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Site- An employee working from the roof was exposed to a fall of up to approximately 20 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2175.5
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2023
Abate by
Jan 31, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,554 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   Site- An employee exposed to a fall while working from the roof was not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1554
  • — Z (S) $3108

View M Pinguil General Corp's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346404700.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.