Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RUNNING TIDE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RUNNING TIDE, INC. in 2 PORTLAND FISH PIER, PORTLAND, ME 04101 (NAICS 112519). OSHA activity number 346415029.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Running Tide, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Running Tide, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RUNNING TIDE, INC.
Site address
2 PORTLAND FISH PIER
City
PORTLAND
State
ME
ZIP
04101
Mailing
30 DANFORTH STREET, PORTLAND, ME 04101
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
112519
Employees
110
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Apr 13, 2023
Penalty
Initial $8,036 · Current $2,411 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(13): The employer did not ensure that no employee carries any object or load that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall while climbing up or down the ladder:   2 Portland Fish Pier, Portland, Maine - The employer did not ensure employees accessing the mezzanine level by portable ladder did not carry objects that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall while climbing up and down the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2410.8
  • — Z (S) $8036

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
May 10, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,046 · Current $3,014 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i):  2 Portland Fish Pier, Portland, ME - The employer did not ensure employees accessing a mezzanine over seven feet from the lower level were protected from falls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3013.8
  • — Z (S) $10046

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,046 · Current $3,014 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:   2 Portland Fish Pier, Portland, Maine - The employer did not ensure the chuck and bit on a drill press used in the facility was guarded to prevent injury.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3013.8
  • — Z (S) $10046

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,026 · Current $1,808 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure.  2 Portland Fish Pier, Portland, Maine - Extension cords and power strips were used as permanent wiring in the following instances:        a)  Break/conference room - computers and microwave       b)  Main Shop Area - Drill press machine, coffee machine, and grinder
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1807.8
  • — Z (S) $6026

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,046 · Current $3,014 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Establishment - The employer did not create a written hazard communication program for employees who use hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to Rynolite Chemical Cleaner Etcher, Denatured Alcohol, Isopropyl Alcohol, 3M Chemical Adhesive, Acetone, and Gumout Starting Fluid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3013.8
  • — Z (S) $10046

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.  Establishment: The employer did not create a list of hazardous chemicals used by employees such as but not limited Rynolite Chemical Cleaner Etcher, Denatured Alcohol, Isopropyl Alcohol, 3M Chemical Adhesive, Acetone, and Gumout Starting Fluid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):   Establishment - The employer did not have safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals used by employees such as but not limited to Rynolite Chemical Cleaner Etcher, Denatured Alcohol, Isopropyl Alcohol,3M Chemical Adhesive, Acetone, and Gumout Starting Fluid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2023
Abate by
Apr 28, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Establishment: The employer did not provide employees training while exposing them to the dangers associated with the use and storage of hazardous chemicals included but not limited to Rynolite Chemical Cleaner Etcher, Denatured Alcohol, Isopropyl Alcohol, 3M Chemical Adhesive, Acetone, and Gumout Starting Fluid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346415029.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.