ARCOLA, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BENJAMIN REYNOSO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BENJAMIN REYNOSO in 4962 PINEHAVEN LANE, ARCOLA, TX 77583 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346421027.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BENJAMIN REYNOSO
- Site address
- 4962 PINEHAVEN LANE
- City
- ARCOLA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77583
- Mailing
- 1905 LAFFERTY ROAD, PASADENA, TX 77502
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 2, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $2,009 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a) At this jobsite, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9-feet and greater while working on a roof without using fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2009.4
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 2, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $2,009 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a) At this jobsite, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9-feet and greater when he used an aluminum extension ladder that did not extend three feet above the roof landing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2009.4
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Feb 2, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support): a) At the jobsite, the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of an aluminum extension ladder was approximately one-half of the working length of the ladder, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346421027.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.