ARCOLA, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JUBENTINO MUNOZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUBENTINO MUNOZ in 4958 PINEHAVEN LANE, ARCOLA, TX 77583 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346421050.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JUBENTINO MUNOZ
- Site address
- 4958 PINEHAVEN LANE
- City
- ARCOLA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77583
- Mailing
- 8914 LOCKWOOD DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77016
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 2, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while working from the ground without wearing hard hats.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1340
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 2, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using a nail gun without wearing eye protection. b) At the jobsite, an employee was exposed to struck-by hazards while operating a circular saw without wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1340
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 2, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $2,344 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10-feet and greater while working on the roof of a house without using fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2344
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 2, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $1,696 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10-feet when they used an aluminum ladder at the rear of the house that was not set three feet above the porch roof. b) At the jobsite, employee were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10-feet when they used an aluminum ladder at the rear left side of the house that was not set three feet above the porch roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1696
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Feb 2, 2023
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support). a) At the jobsite, the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of an aluminum extension ladder was approximately one-half of the working length of the ladder, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Jubentino Munoz
View Jubentino Munoz's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346421050.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.