Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANDRES BELLO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANDRES BELLO in 4950 PINEHAVEN LANE, ARCOLA, TX 77583 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346421084.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Andres Bello — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Andres Bello is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANDRES BELLO
Site address
4950 PINEHAVEN LANE
City
ARCOLA
State
TX
ZIP
77583
Mailing
5547 GASMER DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77035
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2023
Abate by
Mar 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,679 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees exposed to possible head injury from falling or flying objects or from impact with equipment, hand tools and overhead block-laying operations, were not wearing hard hats:  a) At this jobsite, an employee was exposed to struck-by hazards while working on the ground without wearing a hard hat.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2679

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2023
Abate by
Mar 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,679 · Current $1,606 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):  Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a) An employee was exposed to struck-by hazards while operating a nail gun without wearing eye protection.   b) An employee was exposed to struck-by hazards while operating a circular saw without wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1606
  • — Z (S) $2679

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2023
Abate by
Mar 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $2,009 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  a)  An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9-feet and greater while working on the roof of a house without using fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2009
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2023
Abate by
Mar 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $2,009 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):  When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  a)  An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9-feet and greater when he used an aluminum extension ladder that was not extended three feet above the roof landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2009
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2023
Abate by
Mar 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(5)(i):  Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):  a) At the jobsite, the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of an aluminum extension ladder was approximately one-half of the working length of the ladder, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Andres Bello's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346421084.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.