Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: CADIA HEALTHCARE BROADMEADOW

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CADIA HEALTHCARE BROADMEADOW in 500 SOUTH BROAD STREET, MIDDLETOWN, DE 19709 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 346428162.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cadia Healthcare Broadmeadow for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cadia Healthcare Broadmeadow is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
500 SOUTH BROAD STREET
City
MIDDLETOWN
State
DE
ZIP
19709
Mailing
500 SOUTH BROAD STREET, MIDDLETOWN, DE 19709
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
183
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 13 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2023
Abate by
May 12, 2023
Penalty
Initial $9,488 · Current $3,795 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.    a) 500 South Broad Street Middletown, DE 19709: On or about January 10, 2023, CSHO observed employees wearing N95, negative pressure, half-face respirators for entry into a restricted area [e.g. COVID-19 positive residents] of the long term care facility and confirmed the employees did not have a medical evaluation prior to required use of the N95 Model 3M 9210 respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3795.2
  • · Z (S) $9488

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 346428162.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.