PITTSFIELD, MA —
OSHA Inspection: GAESAR ORTIZ
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GAESAR ORTIZ in 188 ELM ST, PITTSFIELD, MA 01201 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346438724.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GAESAR ORTIZ
- Site address
- 188 ELM ST
- City
- PITTSFIELD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01201
- Mailing
- 5 KONKEL DR, DUDLEY, MA 01571
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19 c (1) The employer did not certify to OSHA (the Agency) within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each cited violation has been abated: As of July 17, 2023, the employer had not provided abatement certification for inspection number 1643872, which was issued on January 11, 2023, for Citation 1 Item 1, Citation 1 Item 3a and Citation 1 Item 3b, with a final order date of June 28, 2023 for a work site located at 188 Elm St, Pittsfield, MA.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2023
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: As of July 17, 2023 , the employer had not submitted to the Agency documents that abatement had been completed for any serious violation indicated by the Agency included in Citation1 Item 1, Citation 1 Item 3a and Citation 1 Item 3b from inspection number 1643872, issued January 11, 2023 , with a final order date of June 28, 2023 for a work site located 188 Elm Street Pittsfield, MA.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Mar 15, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10):Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system: 188 Elm St., Pittsfield, MA: On or about January 11, 2023, four employee(s) were observed working on a low slope roof engaged in roofing activities on a roof with unprotected sides and edges greater than 11 feet to the next lower and were not protected by either guard rails, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or flagging and monitor systems exposing them to fall from height hazards. Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.150 C01 VI
- Issued
- Mar 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(vi):A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 10B, was not provided within 50 feet of wherever more than 5 gallons of flammable or combustible liquids or 5 pounds of flammable gas are being used on the jobsite: 188 Elm St., Pittsfield, MA: On or about January 11, 2023, the employer did not provide a fire extinguisher where there was more than 5 gallons of flammable roofing materials and more than 5 pounds of flammable gas in use at the site.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 15, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: 188 Elm St., Pittsfield, MA: On or about January 11, 2023, four employees were exposed to fall hazards as part of their assigned duties and the employer had not trained them prior to exposure to these hazards in topics such as but not limited to recognition of fall hazards, dangers of fall hazards and procedures each employee must take to prevent or minimize risk of such exposures.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Mar 15, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record: 188 Elm St., Pittsfield, MA: On or about January 11, 2023, for those employees performing work and exposed to fall hazards, the employer had not prepared a written certification record of fall protection training which included the name or other identity of the person trained, the signature of the person trained, date(s) the training was completed and the signature of the person who conducted the training.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Mar 15, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i):Non-self-supporting ladders shall be used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support): 188 Elm St., Pittsfield, MA: On or about January 11, 2023, the employer had not ensured that employee(s) using portable extension ladders to access an upper level and were installed in manner in which the working angle did not exceed a ratio of 4:1 or one quarter the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346438724.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.