HORSESHOE BAY, TX —
OSHA Inspection: MUSTANG ELECTRIC
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of MUSTANG ELECTRIC in 384 BLAZING STAR, HORSESHOE BAY, TX 78657 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 346440225.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MUSTANG ELECTRIC
- Site address
- 384 BLAZING STAR
- City
- HORSESHOE BAY
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78657
- Mailing
- 7503 FM2147 SUITE 2, HORSESHOE BAY, TX 78657
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238210
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs that provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were installing electrical wiring on a residential home under construction without inspections being conducted by the employer, exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to, falls and struck-by.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.50 C
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.50(c): A person who has a valid certificate in first-aid training was not available at the worksite to render first-aid: On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a person who was trained to render first-aid at the worksite, exposing employees to a delay in medical treatment.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C01
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height-to-base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph. On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, an employee was working from a mobile scaffold that was not restrained where the height to base ratio exceeded 4:1, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, an employee was working from the top platform of a mobile scaffold over 10 feet high without fall protection, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.452 W02
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner: On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, an employee was working from a mobile scaffold over 10 feet high without locking out the casters, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.452 W06
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(6): Employees were not prohibited from riding on scaffolds: On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, an employee standing on mobile scaffold platform was moved by other employees, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jun 22, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. On or about January 11, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were working from scaffolding without receiving training from the employer, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Mustang Electric
View Mustang Electric's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238210)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346440225.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.