OSHA Inspection: AIRE MAX ENTERPRISES LLC

Issued

Sep 28, 2023

Abate by

Oct 4, 2023

Penalty

Initial $376 · Current $376

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On or about September 28, 2023:  Citation 2 Item 1: The employer failed to certify to OSHA that the cited standard had been abated.

Issued

Mar 21, 2023

Abate by

Mar 27, 2023

Penalty

Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.28(b)(3)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each employee is protected from falling through any hole (including skylights) that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level by one or more of the following methods listed in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(3)(i)(A)-(D):   On or about January 13, 2023, on the roof of a warehouse, employees were exposed to a fall hazard exceeding four feet while performing work without being protected from falling through skylights.

Issued

Mar 21, 2023

Abate by

Mar 27, 2023

Penalty

Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.140(c)(7): The employer did not ensure that fall protection system D-rings, snaphooks, and carabiners are capable of sustaining a minimum tensile load of 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN).   On or about December 30, 2022, on the roof of a warehouse, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while using snaphooks that were not capable of sustaining a minimum tensile load of 5,000 pounds.

Issued

Mar 21, 2023

Abate by

Mar 27, 2023

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.140(c)(8): The employer did not ensure that fall protection system D -rings, snaphooks, and carabiners are proof tested to a minimum tensile load of 3,600 pounds (16 kN) without cracking, breaking, or incurring permanent deformation. The employer did not ensure that the gate strength of fall protection system snaphooks and carabiners are capable of withstanding a minimum load of 3,600 pounds (16 kN) without the gate separating from the nose of the snaphook or carabiner body by more than 0.125 inches (3.175 mm).   On or about December 30, 2022 on the roof of a warehouse, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while using snaphooks that were not proof tested to a minimum tensile load of 3,600 pounds.

Issued

Mar 21, 2023

Abate by

Mar 27, 2023

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.140(c)(9): The employer did not ensure that fall protection system snaphooks and carabiners are the automatic locking type that require at least two separate, consecutive movements to open.   On or about December 30, 2022 on the roof of a warehouse, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while performing work using snaphooks that were not the automatic locking type.

Issued

Mar 21, 2023

Abate by

Mar 27, 2023

Penalty

Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.140(d)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that personal fall arrest systems limit the maximum arresting force on the employee to 1,800 pounds (8 kN).  On or about December 30, 2022, on the roof of a warehouse, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while performing work without a personal fall arrest system that limited the maximum arresting forces on the employee to 1,800 pounds.

Issued

Mar 21, 2023

Abate by

May 5, 2023

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.30(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each employee is trained by a qualified person.   On or about January 13, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not verify each employee was trained on fall protection by a competent person.