OAK CREEK, WI —
OSHA Inspection: MPF BUILDERS LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MPF BUILDERS LLC in 10171 S. KENDRICK DR., OAK CREEK, WI 53154 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346443039.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MPF BUILDERS LLC
- Site address
- 10171 S. KENDRICK DR.
- City
- OAK CREEK
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53154
- Mailing
- 2815 WAUKESHA RD., FRANKSVILLE, WI 53126
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,984 · Current $2,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employer. (a) On or about January 18, 2023, a competent person was on site but did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the job site to ensure that hazardous conditions were identified and corrected. Employees were exposed to fall hazards from not implementing fall protection while working from the roof and improperly installed ladders for accessing the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2750
- — Z (S) $3984
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,277 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) On or about January 18 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employee assisting in framing operations (ground worker) was protected from potential falling objects from above by a protective helmet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2277
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,984 · Current $2,750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) On or about January 18, 2023, employees conducting roof sheathing work on a 8:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately Ten (10) feet seven (7) inches onto dirt, gravel, and building material on the South side of the structure , and eleven (11) foot, two inches on the East side of structure near the garage entrance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2750
- — Z (S) $3984
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,846 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) On or about January 18, 2023, the employer had not provided a training program for those employees exposed to fall hazards with knowledge in the recognition of fall hazards and implementation of fall protection systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2846
1926.602 C01 VIII A
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,984 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(viii)(A): The industrial truck was not equipped with a safety platform/cage firmly secured to the lifting carriage and/or forks when used for lifting personnel: (a) On or about January 18, 2023, employee (s) were working suspended from the forks of a JLG (model 6042) all terrain fork lift, while standing on a stack of 4 foot by 8 foot sheets of 3/4 inch thick decking material that was laying on but not secured to the forks or lifting carriage of the all terrain forklift. This exposed the employee(s) to a fall hazard to the lower level of approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3984
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,846 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where a portable ladder(s) was used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. (a) On or about January 18, 2023, the Werner Extension ladder erected on the East side of the structure, at the garage entrance, being used for access to the 8:12 pitched roof, did not extend at least three (3) feet above the landing edge, and/or was not secured to the structure when it was not sufficiently extended. This exposed employees accessing the roof to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet, two inches. (b) On or about January 18, 2023, the Werner Extension ladder erected on the East side of the structure, at or near the front door entrance, being used for access to the second floor window, did not extend at least three (3) feet above the landing edge, and/or was not secured to the structure when it was not sufficiently extended. This exposed employees accessing the roof to a fall hazard of approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2846
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: (a) On or about January 18, 2023, an employee working outside a framed residential structure did not insure an eight (8) foot self supporting portable step ladder was used as designed. The eight (8) foot step ladder was left in the closed position and leaned against a wall while the employee used the ladder to reach above. This exposed employee to a tip and fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at MPF Builders LLC
View MPF Builders LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346443039.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.