MEDFORD, MA —
OSHA Inspection: HALLIE CONSTRUCTION INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HALLIE CONSTRUCTION INC in 14 CHERRY STREET, MEDFORD, MA 02153 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 346444466.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HALLIE CONSTRUCTION INC
- Site address
- 14 CHERRY STREET
- City
- MEDFORD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02153
- Mailing
- 44 HAYES STREET, LYNN, MA 01905
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA; On or about January 18, 2023, an employee was permitted to work in the direct vicinity of the home's energized electrical service while installing "Tyvek" wrap on the exterior and roof work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250
- — Z (S) $6250
1926.451 B05 II
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): Ends of platforms greater than 10 feet in length extended more than 18 inches over the centerline of its support, without being designed and installed so to prevent tipping of the cantilevered end loaded with employees and/or materials or provided with guardrails to prevent employees from accessing the cantilevered end. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA; On or about January 18, 2023, employees were exposed to falls while working/walking from cantilevered scaffold platforms in the following instances: Instance A) Two employees were working/walking on a pump jack scaffold platform that extended greater than seven feet on left side and six-feet on right side of supports. Instance B) An employee was working/walking on a ladder jack scaffold platform that extended greater than four feet on left side and three feet on right side of supports.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250
- — Z (S) $6250
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA. On or about January 18, 2023, employees were exposed to fall hazards in the following instances: Instance A) An employee was working/walking on the left front pump jack scaffold system that had two insufficient mudsills to support scaffold. Instance B) Two employees were working/walking on the left rear pump jack scaffold system that had an insufficient mudsill to support scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA; On or about January 18, 2023, employees were exposed to fall hazards from incorrect scaffold access in the following instances: Instance A) Two employees utilized an aluminum extension ladder that was set-up against the work shelf and not the pump jack scaffold platform. The placement of the ladder in this configuration required the employees to crawl over the workbench to access the scaffold platform, further increasing the likelihood of a fall. Instance B) An employee on the right side of the house utilized the ladder(s) supporting the scaffold plank to access the work area. Employee were observed climbing over the ladder jacks to then access the scaffold platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA. On or about January 18, 2023, employees were exposed to falls in the following instances: Instance A) An employee working/walking at a height greater than 16 feet on the front left pump jack scaffold was not protected from falling to lower level. Instance B) Two employees working/walking at a height greater than 11 feet on the left rear pump jack scaffold were not protected from falling to lower level. Instance C) An employee working/walking at a height greater than 16 feet on the right side of the house ladder jack scaffold was not protected from falling to lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA. On or about January 18, 2023, employees were exposed to falls in the following instances: Instance A) An employee working /walking on the left front pump jack scaffold and was exposed to falls where pump jack scaffold poles were not secured from displacement with a rigid triangular brace at the bottom. Instance B) Two employees working /walking on the left rear pump jack scaffold and were exposed to falls where pump jack scaffold poles were not secured from displacement with a rigid triangular brace at the bottom.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA. On or about January 18, 2023, employees were exposed to falls in the following instances: Instance A) An employee working/walking on the front roof section of the house was exposed to falling greater than 13 feet above lower level. Instance B) An employee working/walking on the left back porch roof section was exposed to fall hazard greater than 12 feet above lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250
- — Z (S) $6250
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used for the purpose for which they were designed. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA. On or about January 18, 2023, two employees were climbing onto an aluminum extension ladder that was being utilized in the horizontal position as a scaffold workbench.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250
- — Z (S) $6250
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA. On or about January 18, 2023, an employee used a non-self-supporting aluminum ladder that was erected at in incorrect angle. The lader was set up at a 62� whereas the manufacturer requires 75� angle.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders shall be used only on stable and level surfaces unless secured to prevent accidental displacement. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA. On or about January 18, 2023, two employees were using an aluminum extension ladder that was unstable, unlevel and not secured to prevent displacement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA. On or about January 18, 2023, an employee was using a damaged aluminum extension ladder that was not tagged or withdrawn from service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.32 A02
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $893 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(2): The employer did not create an annual summary of injuries and illnesses recorded on the OSHA 300 Log. Location - 14 Cherry Street, Medford, MA. On or about January 18, 2023, employer does not maintain or post 300/300A logs.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $893
More inspections at Hallie Construction INC
View Hallie Construction INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346444466.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.