Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MARINE MANUFACTURING GROUP

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MARINE MANUFACTURING GROUP in 605 SOUTH STATE STREET, PAINESVILLE, OH 44077 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 346461502.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Marine Manufacturing Group for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Marine Manufacturing Group is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
605 SOUTH STATE STREET
City
PAINESVILLE
State
OH
ZIP
44077
Mailing
ATTN: JULIE SNYDER 605 SOUTH STATE STREET, PAINESVILLE, OH 44077
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336612
Employees
35
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,750 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  On or about January 26, 2023, the employer failed to provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator for employees required to wear dust masks while working in the lamination department.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3750
  • · Z (S) $6250

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.  On or about January 26, 2023, the employer failed to ensure employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator for employees required to use dust masks while working in the lamination department.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification.  On or about January 26, 2023, the employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator when supplying Qidian KN95 masks to employees required to wear dust masks in the lamination department.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 346461502.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.