RIDGEFIELD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ALEX MATUTE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALEX MATUTE in 800 ETHAN ALLEN HIGHWAY, RIDGEFIELD, CT 06877 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346467483.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALEX MATUTE
- Site address
- 800 ETHAN ALLEN HIGHWAY
- City
- RIDGEFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06877
- Mailing
- 1802 GOLDENEYE DRIVE, CHESAPEAKE, VA 23320
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $2,813 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Worksite: On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees working on a third-floor level of a building under construction, up to approximately 30 feet 8 inches from the ground were protected by fall hazards by the use of safety nets, personal fall arrest systems or properly constructed guard rail systems: a) The employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 30ft 8in when working at the front of the building. b) The employees were exposed to a fall of approximately 21ft when working at the rear of the building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2812.8
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees working on a third-floor level of a building under construction, up to approximately 30 feet 8 inches from the ground were trained in fall hazard awareness and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 B01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): The top edge height of the top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members shall be 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level. Worksite: On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees were protected from fall hazards while framing the third floor due to the top rail measuring approximately 30.5 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 B02
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Mid-rails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall shall be at least 21 inches (53 cm) high. Worksite: On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees were protected from fall hazards while framing the third floor due to the mid-rail measuring approximately 12 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 B09
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(9): Top rails and midrails were not at least one-quarter (0.6 cm) nominal diameter or thickness to prevent cuts and lacerations. Wire rope used as top rails was not flagged at 6-foot (1.8 m) intervals or less with high-visibility materials: Worksite: On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees were protected from fall hazards while framing the third floor due to the guardrail system not being flagged with high visibility material.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,607 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step. Worksite: On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure that an employee using an A-frame ladder did not stand on the top-most rungs.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1607.4
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Worksite: On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees using an A-frame ladder was trained to safely use ladders and to recognize the hazards related to ladder use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 M05 I
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(i): When a powered industrial truck is left unattended, load engaging means were not fully lowered, controls were not neutralized, power was not shut off, and brakes set. Worksite: On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees using an aerial forklift fully lowered the forks to the ground level when the forklift was left unattended.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1608
- — Z (S) $2679
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2023
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation. Worksite: On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees using an aerial forklift were trained in it's safe operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346467483.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.