Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FAB GLASS & MIRROR

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FAB GLASS & MIRROR in 499 DOUGLAS RD. E., OLDSMAR, FL 34677 (NAICS 423390). OSHA activity number 346473770.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch FAB Glass & Mirror — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for FAB Glass & Mirror is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FAB GLASS & MIRROR
Site address
499 DOUGLAS RD. E.
City
OLDSMAR
State
FL
ZIP
34677
Mailing
499 DOUGLAS RD.E., OLDSMAR, FL 34677
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423390
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,125 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by and crush-by hazards when utilizing damaged steel storage racks:    a)  Warehouse 1, on or about 02/01/2023, throughout the warehouse the employer did not ensure that the steel storage racks with visible damage were immediately isolated until the damaged portions were evaluated by a storage rack design professional and were not placed back into service until repaired and certification was obtained that the repaired components of the storage rack system were restored to at least their original design capacity.  b) Warehouse 2, on or about 02/01/2023, throughout the warehouse the employer did not ensure that the steel storage racks with visible damage were immediately isolated until the damaged portions were evaluated by a storage rack design professional and were not placed back into service until repaired and certification was obtained that the repaired components of the storage rack system were restored to at least their original design capacity.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3125
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,678 · Current $1,339 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:   a) Warehouse 1, on or about 02/01/2023,  employees working in the warehouse were exposed to emergency egress and fire related hazards, in that, the exit door on the south side of the building was locked with a sliding dead bolt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1339
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,678 · Current $1,339 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:   a) Warehouse 1, on or about 02/01/2023,  employees working in the warehouse were exposed to emergency egress and fire related hazards, in that, the exit route on the east side of the building was blocked with a pallet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1339
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,125 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  a) On or about 02/01/2023, the employer used fork extensions on the Toyota forklift (Model 8EG0032 S/N: 18219) , without requesting the manufacturer's prior written approval, exposing employees to crushed-by and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3125
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.178 A05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  a) On or about 02/01/2023, the employer used fork extensions  on the Toyota forklift (Model 8EG0032 S/N: 18219)which were not marked to indicate the capacity of the vehicle when 84" fork extensions were used, exposing employees to crushed-by and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,678 · Current $1,339 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.   a) On or about 02/01/2023,  employees were exposed to struck by hazards, in that, forklift operators did not receive formal training for power industrial trucks but were allowed to operate forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1339
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,678 · Current $1,339 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:   a) Warehouse 2, on or about 02/01/2023,  employees were exposed to electrical shock and fire hazards, in that, electrical service panels were blocked with charging unit for electric forklift/order picker.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1339
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,678 · Current $1,339 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):    a) Warehouse 1, on or about 02/01/2023,  the employer exposed employees to electrical shock hazards, in that, there was exposed electrical wiring for a light switch supplying power to lighting above job packaging station 1.  b) Warehouse 1, on or about 02/01/2023,  the employer exposed employees to electrical shock hazards, in that, there was exposed electrical wiring for a light switch supplying power to lighting above job packaging station 2.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1339
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,678 · Current $1,339 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:   a) Warehouse 1, on or about 02/01/2023,  the employer exposed employees to electrical shock hazards, in that, extension cords were used a substitute for fixed wiring to power job packaging station 1.  b) Warehouse 1, on or about 02/01/2023,  the employer exposed employees to electrical shock hazards, in that, extension cords were used a substitute for fixed wiring to power job packaging station 2.  c) Warehouse 1, on or about 02/01/2023,  the employer exposed employees to electrical shock hazards, in that, extension cords were used a substitute for fixed wiring to power workbench with chop saw.  d) Warehouse 2, on or about 02/01/2023,  the employer exposed employees to electrical shock hazards, in that, extension cords were used a substitute for fixed wiring to power computer workstation adjacent to electrical service panels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1339
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.157 C04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2023
Abate by
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not maintained in a fully charged and operable condition:   a) Warehouse 1, on or about 02/01/2023,  employees working in the warehouse were exposed to fire related hazards, in that, the portable fire extinguisher adjacent to exit door on the south side was not charged.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346473770.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.