KECHI, KS —
OSHA Inspection: KING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of KING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC in 9000 E. 85TH ST. N, KECHI, KS 67067 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 346480304.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC
- Site address
- 9000 E. 85TH ST. N
- City
- KECHI
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 67067
- Mailing
- PO DRAWER 849, HESSTON, KS 67062
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.1428 A03
- Issued
- May 25, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $877 · Current $526 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1428(a)(3): 29 CFR 1926.1428(a)(3): The employer did not make the documentation for whichever option is used available at the site while the signal person is employed by the employer. The documentation did not specify each type of signaling (e.g., hand signals, radio signals, etc.) for which the signal person meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section: At the job site located at 9000 E. 85th St. N. in Sedgwick County, KS, employee(s) engaged in crane operations were exposed to struck by and crush by hazards in that the employer did not provide documentation at the site to show that signal person's had been evaluated, had met the Qualification Requirements, and the signal person certifications provided by the employer at a later date did not state which type of signals employee(s) were qualified in.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $526.2
- — Z (O) $877
1926.1428 C05
- Issued
- May 25, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $877 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1428(c)(5):Each signal person did not demonstrate that he/she meet the requirements in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section through an oral or written test, and through a practical test: At the job site located at 9000 E. 85th St. N, Sedgwick County, KS, employee(s) engaged in crane operations were exposed to struck by and crush by hazards in that the employer did not utilize a form of testing to certify signal persons to ensure each signal person demonstrated that he/she meets the requirements in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) through an oral or written test and through a practical test.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $877
More inspections at King Construction Company INC
View King Construction Company INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346480304.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.