Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SCHWEBEL BAKING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SCHWEBEL BAKING COMPANY in 965 EAST MIDLOTHIAN BLVD., BOARDMAN, OH 44512 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 346485899.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Schwebel Baking Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Schwebel Baking Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
965 EAST MIDLOTHIAN BLVD.
City
BOARDMAN
State
OH
ZIP
44512
Mailing
965 EAST MIDLOTHIAN BLVD., BOARDMAN, OH 44512
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311812
Employees
230
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $7,972 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(5)(ii):  Lockout devices and tagout devices were not singularly identified:  On or about January 27, 2023, the employer failed to ensure that when maintenance tasks were performed by a (Sanitation Department) crew that the lockout/tagout device was singularly identified with the name of the employee who had isolated the electrical energy source on the Stewart Mono-Flex Grid Bun Cooler.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7972
  • — Z (S) $12278

1910.147 C07 II C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(ii)(C): Tags were not legible and understandable by all authorized employees, affected employees, and all other employees whose work operations were or may have been in the area, in order to be effective:  On or about January 27, 2023, the employer failed to ensure that when maintenance tasks were performed by a (Sanitation Department) crew that the lockout/tagout device was legible and understandable by all authorized employees, affected employees, and all other employees whose work operations were or may have been in the area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $7,971 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard were being followed:  On or about January 27, 2023, the employer did not ensure periodic inspections of energy control procedures were conducted at least annually, including a review of each authorized employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedures. Authorized employees are required to conduct service/maintenance activities on the Stewart Mono-Flex Grid Bun Cooler, requiring them to perform lockout/tagout.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7971
  • — Z (S) $12278

1910.147 C09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $7,971 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(9): The employer or authorized employee did not notify affected employees of the application and removal of lockout or tagout devices from the machine or equipment:  On or about January 27, 2023, the employer or authorized person failed to notify affected employees of the removal of the lockout/tagout device that had been applied to the Stewart Mono-Flex Grid Cooler. The electrical energy source was restarted while affected employees were working in the area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7971
  • — Z (S) $12278

1910.147 E03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $7,971 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(e)(3): Each lockout or tagout device was not removed from each energy isolating device by the employee who applied the device:  On or about January 27, 2023, the employer failed to ensure that the lockout device applied to the electrical energy source, on the Stewart Mono-Flex Grid Bun Cooler, was removed by the authorized employee who applied the device.  The equipment was re-energized after the lockout/tagout hasp was removed in disregard of the excepted provisions in 29 CFR  1910.147(e)(3).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7971
  • — Z (S) $12278

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2023
Abate by
Sep 5, 2023
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $7,971 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment:  On or about January 27, 2023, the employer failed to ensure that when maintenance tasks were performed by a (Sanitation Department) crew of more than one employee group lockout procedures were utilized.  This included, but was not limited to the application of personal lockout and tagout devices and coordination of the workforce when performing tasks on the Stewart Mono-Flex Grid Bun Cooler.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7971
  • — Z (S) $12278

View Schwebel Baking Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346485899.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.