OSHA Inspection: LYNN'S MACHINE INC

Issued

Jul 11, 2023

Abate by

Aug 25, 2023

Penalty

Initial $3,572 · Current $2,143 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  On or about February 07, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not perform a hazard assessment for employees working in the machining process. The employees were exposed to eye, hand, and foot hazards.

Issued

Jul 11, 2023

Abate by

Aug 25, 2023

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1):Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  On or about February 07, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were not provided with face shields or goggles for protection from flying metal. The employees were exposed to eye injuries.

Issued

Jul 11, 2023

Abate by

Aug 25, 2023

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.136(a):The employer did not ensure that protective footwear is used where employees are exposed to foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing sole.  On or about February 07, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees did not use protective footwear when exposed to falling objects and lacerations. The employee were exposed to struck-by and cut hazards.

Issued

Jul 11, 2023

Abate by

Aug 25, 2023

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.138(a):The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees hands were exposed to hazardous condition(s):  On or about February 07, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were not provided with hand protection for protection from cut hazards.

Issued

Jul 11, 2023

Abate by

Aug 11, 2023

Penalty

Initial $2,678 · Current $1,607 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about February 07, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to hazards chemicals including, but not limited to: SterlingCool 14, SterlingCool RP-6, Clean-Tek 40-AL, Waylube 68, and VF-100,  when a written hazard communication program was not developed, implemented and maintained for the workplace

Issued

Jul 11, 2023

Abate by

Aug 11, 2023

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6)(ii):  Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical   On or about February 07, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees used spray bottles containing chemicals such as SterlingCool RP-6 Rust Preventive, that were not labeled, tagged, or marked with the product identifier. Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.