BENNINGTON, NH —
OSHA Inspection: JOSUE ARAUJO
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of JOSUE ARAUJO in BIBLE HILL RD., BENNINGTON, NH 03442 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346509888.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSUE ARAUJO
- Site address
- BIBLE HILL RD.
- City
- BENNINGTON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03442
- Mailing
- 65 SUNSET RD., MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 15, 2023
- Abate by
- May 25, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that, employees were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards from the collapse of a roof structure under construction. Location: Bible Hill Rd. in Bennington, NH. On or about February 10, 2023, the framing techniques in use by the framing crew were not adequate to provide strength to the structure where (1) gable end walls had structural sheathing that was not secured to the framing below, (2) gable wall base plates had not been secured adequately to the framing below, (3) and there was not adequate bracing of the gable end walls to provide structural stability. These conditions contributed to the collapse of the structure, where the framing and bracing practices of the employer did not provide adequate structural strength to withstand environmental elements such as wind pressure at the time of collapse. Two employees suffered serious injuries and a third suffered minor injuries when the roof structure collapsed and struck all three, knocking one off the structure 19 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- May 15, 2023
- Abate by
- May 25, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). Bible Hill Rd. Jobsite - On or about February 10, 2023, the employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to falls through window openings and floor holes, electrical shock hazards from damaged extension cords, and struck-by hazards from the partial collapse of the structure during a high wind event at the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- May 15, 2023
- Abate by
- May 25, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury. Bible Hill Rd. Jobsite - On or about February 10, 2023, the employer did not provide training to employees in recognizing and avoiding unsafe conditions where employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards and falls through window openings and floor holes. Additionally, of significance, employees were not trained to recognize and avoid the unsafe conditions associated with performing their job tasks during a high wind weather event, where exposure to struck-by hazards could occur during the collapse of the structure.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.403 B01 III
- Issued
- May 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that electrical equipment was free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. Safety of equipment was not determined on the basis of the following considerations: Electrical insulation. Bible Hill Rd. Jobsite - On or about February 10, 2023, the employer did not ensure that electrical equipment was free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, where two electrical cords in use at the site were not inspected prior to being placed into service and were being used with damaged outer insulation which exposed internal insulated conductors.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- May 15, 2023
- Abate by
- May 25, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used. Bible Hill Rd. Jobsite - On or about February 10, 2023, two extension cords used at the jobsite had outer insulation damage which exposed inner insulated conductors.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 15, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Location: Jobsite on Bible Hill Rd. Instance a.) On or about February 10, 2023, employees framing a residential home were not protected from falls of between 7 and 11 feet where the window openings at the back of the first floor did not have guardrails installed on them to prevent an employee from falling out. Instance b.) On or about February 10, 2023, employees framing a residential home were not protected from falls of approximately 9 feet from the attic deck to the first floor where the attic deck was not fully sheathed. A large portion of the attic deck was open, where employees could have fallen through the floor joists down to the first floor.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
More inspections at Josue Araujo
View Josue Araujo's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346509888.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.