Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ORTIZ CARPENTRY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ORTIZ CARPENTRY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 25 TAMPER DR. UNIT # G5., ROCHESTER, NH 03867 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346525405.

Watch Ortiz Carpentry Residential AND Commercial Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ortiz Carpentry Residential AND Commercial Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
25 TAMPER DR. UNIT # G5.
City
ROCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03867
Mailing
73 NEWBURY STREET APT 3, LAWRENCE, MA 01840
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part such as a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment and work rules was not developed and/or implemented at the job site.  a. Jobsite - On or about February 21, 2023, the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to eliminate hazards associated with falls, equipment use, ladders and unsafe stairways at the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s).  a. Jobsite - On or about  February 21, 2023, the employer did not perform frequent and regular job site inspections by a competent person to identify hazards associated with falls, lack of PPE and unsafe stairways.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2):The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. Jobsite - On or about February 21, 2023, the employer did not provide training to employees in recognizing and avoiding unsafe conditions where employees were exposed to slips and trips from falls on stairways, injuries  and eye injury hazards without proper PPE.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a. Jobsite - On or about February 21, 2023, the employer did not ensure that eye protective equipment was used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure that meets a provision described in paragraph (b) of this section.  a. Jobsite - On or about February 21, 2023, employees working on the roof were not protected from falls of over 10 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1051(a):Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:  a. Jobsite - The employer did not provide a safe means of access to locations where there was a break in elevation of greater than 19 inches in that employees were climbing onto the windowsill to access the roof which was located on the exterior of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 1 5 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2009.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1052(c)(1)(ii) : Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  a. Interior staircase - On or about February 21, 2023, the staircase utilized by the employees to access the second story work area was not provided with stair railing along the open sided staircase to prevent employees' fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2009

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346525405.