Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MMW INDUSTRIES LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MMW INDUSTRIES LLC in 105 TALAMINE CT., COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80907 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 346555154.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MMW Industries LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MMW Industries LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MMW INDUSTRIES LLC
Site address
105 TALAMINE CT.
City
COLORADO SPRINGS
State
CO
ZIP
80907
Mailing
105 TALAMINE CT., COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80907
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2023
Abate by
Jun 14, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,277 · Current $1,366 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) 105 Talamine Ct, Colorado Springs, CO 80907: On or about March 8, 2023, and at times prior, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program when employees were required to use N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Employees were required to use N95 filtering facepiece respirators when working in production to handle chemicals, apply mold release, and in finishing when grinding and buffing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1366.2
  • — Z (S) $2277

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2023
Abate by
Jun 14, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) 105 Talamine Ct, Colorado Springs, CO 80907: On or about March 8, 2023 and at times prior, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to employees required to use tight fitting respirators. Tight fitting respirators including but not limited to P95 filtering facepiece respirators were required by the employer during daily operations including but not limited to  spraying, pouring, grinding, buffing, and cutting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2023
Abate by
Jun 14, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter:  (a) 105 Talamine Ct, Colorado Springs, CO 80907: On or about March 8, 2023, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators were provided initial or annual fit tests. Employees were required to wear tight fitting P95 filtering facepiece respirators during daily operations including but not limited to  spraying, pouring, grinding, buffing, and cutting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2023
Abate by
Jun 14, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,795 · Current $2,277 Reduced

Hazardous substances 22802460

29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.  (a) 105 Talamine Ct, Colorado Springs, CO 80907: On or about March 8, 2023, and at times prior, the employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection where employees were exposed to hazards from skin absorption from chemicals containing toluene and styrene when working in production.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2277
  • — Z (S) $3795

1910.243 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,036 · Current $1,822 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1): Abrasive wheel(s) were used on portable grinder(s) which were not provided with safety guard(s) meeting the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1) through (c)(4)  (a) 105 Talamine Ct, Colorado Springs, CO 80907: On or about March 8, 2023, and at times prior, the employer did not provide safety guards on portable grinders with abrasive wheels. Employees used a 7-inch Makita portable grinder to remove flash from the casting process. Contact with unguarded rotary equipment may result in serious injury.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1821.6
  • — Z (S) $3036

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346555154.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.