CLARKSTON, GA —
OSHA Inspection: PROJECT WORKSHOP, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PROJECT WORKSHOP, LLC in 675 PARK NORTH BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, CLARKSTON, GA 30021 (NAICS 337215). OSHA activity number 346565179.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PROJECT WORKSHOP, LLC
- Site address
- 675 PARK NORTH BOULEVARD, SUITE 100
- City
- CLARKSTON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30021
- Mailing
- 675 PARK NORTH BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, CLARKSTON, GA 30021
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337215
- Employees
- 34
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $10,938 · Current $7,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to combustible dust deflagration, explosion, and other fire hazards from the deficient design and/or implementation of preventative and/or protective measures in the Power House fly ash conveying system and Cyclone Room paper dust collection system: a) Wood Shop - On or about 3/09/2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards associated with combustible dusts in the event of a deflagration or other uncontrolled fire event in that, although the table saw was equipped with a dust collector it was not working properly, and did not remove accumulated combustible dust that was generated by other wood cutting equipment such as, but not limited to, the DeWalt chop saw.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000
- — Z (S) $10938
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): Poor housekeeping in the work area created unsafe conditions. a) Wood shop area - On or about 3/09/2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards created by combustible wood dust (e.g.: fire hazards to including flames and hazardous byproducts: smoke, toxic gases, etc.) and slip hazards in that, the flooring of the Wood Shop area was not maintained in a clean and safe condition. Excessive wood dust was allowed to accumulate on the walking/working surfaces and around the DEWALT chop saw.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,687 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Paint Booth Area - On or about 3/09/2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that, employees required to wear 3M tight-fitting half face respirators while spray painting the project's parts when the written respiratory protection program was not developed, implement or used at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $4687
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Paint Booth Area - On or about 3/09/2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that, employees required to wear 3M tight-fitting half face respirators while spray painting parts for the projects when the employer failed to ensure a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, was provided to employees before the employee required to use the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Paint Booth Area - On or about 3/09/2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that, employees required to wear a 3M tight-fitting half face respirators while painting parts for the projects when the employer failed to ensure that employees required to use 3M tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: a) Paint Booth Area - On or about 3/14/2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that, employees required to wear 3M tight-fitting half face respirators while spray painting parts for the projects when the employer failed to ensure that the respirators were stored properly to protect them from damage and contamination at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) Throughout the facility - On or about 3/09/2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that powered industrial truck operators were provided with training and evaluation for safe operation of powered industrial trucks when employees were operating Hyundai forklift (25LC-7A) for loading/unloading the projects parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $6250
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $7,813 · Current $4,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) Wood Shop - On or about 3/09/2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards in that, the employer failed to ensure that point of operation machine guarding was provided to SawStop table saw, to protect the machine operators from being exposed to the danger zone while employees were using the unguarded machine for cutting the projects parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4500
- — Z (S) $7813
1910.307 C02
- Issued
- Aug 28, 2023
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $10,938 · Current $6,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(2): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not safe for the hazardous (classified location), nor approved for the hazardous (classified) location or the ignitable or combustible properties of the specific gas, vapor, dust or fiber that was present: a) Wood Shop area - On or about 3/14/2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards in that, the electrical equipment such as, but not limited to electrical boxes used to power the fans located in Class II Division 2 locations were not intrinsically safe nor approved for the hazardous Class II combustible dust location.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6500
- — Z (S) $10938
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337215)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346565179.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.