Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SEAQUEST LITTLETON LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SEAQUEST LITTLETON LLC in 8501 WEST BOWLES AVENUE, LITTLETON, CO 80123 (NAICS 712130). OSHA activity number 346568140.

Watch Seaquest Littleton LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Seaquest Littleton LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8501 WEST BOWLES AVENUE
City
LITTLETON
State
CO
ZIP
80123
Mailing
5759 N DISCOVERY WY, BOISE, ID 83719
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
712130
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6696.00 · Current $3348.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(c):  The employer did not provide, and did not ensure each employee uses, a safe means of access and egress to and from walking-working surfaces:  (a) On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that all employee walkways and paths in the employee back areas were full exit paths that were free from obstruction and allowed safe egress.  This condition exposed employees to fire and life safety hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3348
  • — Z (S) $6696

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 6 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6696.00 · Current $3348.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  (a) In the service room behind the "Caves" exhibits: On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that adequate electrical service was provided. Extension cords were used in lieu of permanent wiring. This condition exposed employees to electric shock and fire hazards.   (b) In the "Spiny Lobster" exhibit: On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that adequate electrical service was provided. Extension cords were used in lieu of permanent wiring. This condition exposed employees to electric shock and fire hazards.   (c) In the "China" exhibit: On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that adequate electrical service was provided. Extension cords were used in lieu of permanent wiring. This condition exposed employees to electric shock and fire hazards.   (d) In the "South Pacific" exhibit: On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that adequate electrical service was provided. Extension cords were used in lieu of permanent wiring. This condition exposed employees to electric shock and fire hazards.   (e) In the "Middle Sump" area: On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that adequate electrical service was provided. Extension cords were used in lieu of permanent wiring. This condition exposed employees to electric shock and fire hazards.   (f) In the "Tang Angel" exhibit: On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that adequate electrical service was provided. Extension cords were used in lieu of permanent wiring. This condition exposed employees to electric shock and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3348
  • — Z (S) $6696

1910.305 G01 IV B

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(B): Flexible cords and/or cables were run through holes in walls, ceilings, or floors:  (a) In the "maintenance hallway": On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that flexible cords were used in accordance with this standard. An extension cord was run through a hole in the wall into the next room.  (a) In the "middle sump" area: On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that flexible cords were used in accordance with this standard. Extension cords were run through a hole in the wall into the next room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6696.00 · Current $3348.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   (a) On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program. This condition exposed employees to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to: bleach, STS, Virkon, and Pau Pilau wetsuit cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3348
  • — Z (S) $6696

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) On or before 3/15/23, the employer did not ensure that all employees were trained on the hazards associated with the chemicals they use. This condition exposed employees to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to: bleach, STS, Virkon, and Pau Pilau wetsuit cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346568140.