HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE in 1101 BATES AVENUE, HOUSTON, TX 77030 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 346576192.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
- Site address
- 1101 BATES AVENUE
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77030
- Mailing
- ONE BAYLOR PLAZA, HOUSTON, TX 77030
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 622110
- Employees
- 977
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $8,930 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1910.134(f)(2) The employer shall ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter. 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, employees required to wear N95 respirators for protection from airborne biologicals were not medically evaluated to determine the employee's ability to use the respirator, exposing employees to physiologic stresses.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $8930
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1910.134(e)(1) General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator. 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, employees required to wear N95 respirators for protection from airborne biologicals were not fit-tested, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 C02
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $0 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(c)(2): The employer did not assure that no employee was exposed to an airborne concentration of formaldehyde which exceeded two parts formaldehyde per million parts of air (2 ppm) as a 15-minute STEL: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not assure that employees were not exposed to an airborne concentration of formaldehyde exceeding two parts formaldehyde per million parts of air (2 ppm) as a 15-minute STEL.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 D02
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $5,581 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
1910.1048(d)(2) Initial monitoring. The employer shall identify all employees who may be exposed at or above the action level or at or above the STEL and accurately determine the exposure of each employee so identified. 29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(2)(ii):The initial monitoring process was not repeated each time there was a change in production, equipment, process, personnel, or control measures which could have resulted in new or additional exposure to formaldehyde: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the initial monitoring process was not repeated each time there was a change in production, equipment, process, personnel, or control measures which could result in new or additional exposure to formaldehyde, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — D (O) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 D02 II
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $0 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
1910.1048(d)(2)(ii) The initial monitoring process shall be repeated each time there is a change in production, equipment, process, personnel, or control measures which may result in new or additional exposure to formaldehyde. 29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(2)(iii):The employer received reports of signs or symptoms of respiratory or dermal conditions associated with formaldehyde exposure and the employer did not promptly monitor the affected employee's exposure: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, when the employer received reports of signs and symptoms of respiratory conditions associated with formaldehyde exposure, the employer did not promptly monitor the affected employees' exposures, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 F01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $5,581 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(f)(1): Engineering controls and work practices were not instituted to reduce and maintain employee exposures to formaldehyde at or below the TWA and the STEL: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, engineering controls were not maintained to keep employee exposures to formaldehyde at or below the STEL, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 G01 I
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $5,581 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(g)(1)(i): The employer did not provide required respirators and ensure their use by employees during the interval necessary to install or implement feasible engineering and work practice controls: (a) In the Cryostat lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to inhalation hazards due to employer not providing employees with respirators to maintain exposure of hazardous substances such as but not limited to Formaldehyde below permissible exposure limits during periods necessary to install or implement feasible engineering and work practice controls.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $5581
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $11,162
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(l)(1)(i): The employer did not institute medical surveillance programs for all employees exposed to formaldehyde at concentrations at or exceeding the action level or exceeding the STEL: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not institute medical surveillance programs for all employees exposed to formaldehyde at concentrations exceeding the STEL, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $11162
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
1910.1048 N03
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $11,162
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(3):The training program for all employees exposed to formaldehyde was not conducted in a manner which the employee was able to understand: a) In Cryostat Lab 0295, on or about March 16, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the training program did not include a discussion of 29 CFR 1910.1048; a discussion of the contents of the Safety Data Sheet for formaldehyde; the purpose for and a description of the medical surveillance program required by 29 CFR 1910.1048, including a description of the potential health hazards associated with exposure to formaldehyde and a description of the signs and symptoms of exposure to formaldehyde and instructions to immediately report to the employer the development of any adverse signs or symptoms that the employee suspects is attributable to formaldehyde exposure; an explanation of the safe work practices appropriate for limiting exposure to formaldehyde for each job; the purpose for, proper use of, and limitations of personal protective equipment; instructions for the handling of spills, emergencies, and clean-up procedures; an explanation of the importance of engineering and work practice controls for employee protection and necessary instruction in the use of these controls; and a review of emergency procedures including the specific duties or assignments of each employee in the event of an emergency, exposing employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — D (S) $11162
- — C (S) $11162
- — Z (S) $11162
More inspections at Baylor College of Medicine
View Baylor College of Medicine's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 622110)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346576192.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.