WAUNAKEE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: RCP-PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RCP-PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION LLC in 1117 REESE TRAIL, WAUNAKEE, WI 53597 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346580285.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RCP-PREMIUM CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 1117 REESE TRAIL
- City
- WAUNAKEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53597
- Mailing
- 2112 HIGH RIDGE TRL APT 205, FITCHBURG, WI 53713
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2023
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: The employer failed to submit certification of abatement within 10 calendar days of the abatement date Citation 1 Item 1 and Citation 1 item 2.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2023
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. The employer failed to submit certification of abatement within 10 calendar days of the abatement date Citation 1 Item 3 and Citation 1 Item 4.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,009 · Current $2,009
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. On or about April 12, 2023, employee did not wear safety glasses when operating pneumatic nail gun.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2009
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Jul 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. On or about April 12, 2023, the pump jack scaffolds were not anchored to the ground.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b) On or about April 12, 2023, employee was observed at heights greater than six feet and was not protected from falls by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 21, 2023
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about April 12, 2023, a portable ladder was used for access to an upper landing surface of the residential roof and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346580285.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.