FAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ANDY GONZALEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANDY GONZALEZ in 1003 CARDIFF COURT, FAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP, OH 45011 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346588445.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANDY GONZALEZ
- Site address
- 1003 CARDIFF COURT
- City
- FAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45011
- Mailing
- 8513 MYRTLEWOOD AVENUE, CINCINNATI, OH 45236
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) On or about March 22, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees exposed to a 22 ft. fall hazard were utilizing a fall protection system, while working on framing the roof of a new residential structure.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The following training provisions supplement and clarify the requirements of 1926.21 regarding the hazards addressed in Subpart M of this part. Training program. The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. a) On or about March 22, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided training on fall protection systems and on hazards of fall, while working at heights of 22 ft. from the ground.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346588445.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.